For what you can reward employees - wording. Correct formulation of employee bonuses: what can an employee be rewarded for? List of reasons for payment

Today the names of the Nobel Prize winners in chemistry will be announced. This is the most prestigious award in the scientific world: laureates in five categories - Physiology and Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, Economics, Literature, and the Peace Prize - are announced in October, and the award ceremony takes place in Stockholm December 10, the anniversary of the death of the founder of the prize, Swedish chemist Alfred Nobel.

The Nobel Committee has already won in the Physiology and Medicine category. They were immunologists James Ellison and Tasuku Honjo. The researchers were recognized for developing cancer immunotherapy.

On October 2, the award was awarded: the winners were scientists Arthur Ashkin - for "optical tweezers and its application in biological systems", Gerard Mourou and Donna Strickland - for "a method for generating high-intensity ultrashort optical pulses." Donna Strickland became the third woman to receive a Nobel Prize in physics, after Marie Skladowska-Curie and Maria Goeppert-Mayer.

Now we’ll tell you what interesting things are happening around the Nobel Prize in Chemistry.

Disputes between chemists and biologists

In recent years, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry has been heavily criticized by chemists themselves. The fact is that scientists from “non-chemical” specialties are increasingly winning awards. From 1982 to 2012, the Nobel Prize was awarded ten times for research in biochemistry or molecular biology. From 2002 to 2012, only four awards went to chemistry papers.

Last year there was an award for biochemists. The award went to Jacques Duboucher (Sweden), Joachim Francouis (USA) and Richard Henderson (Great Britain) for developing a method of cryoelectron microscopy, which allows the molecules of living organisms to be examined in detail. Scientists have been doing their research since the late 70s and as a result made a big breakthrough in biology: using an electron microscope, it became possible to obtain three-dimensional images and study molecular substances from different angles.

Alfred Nobel himself did not say anything about biologists in his will - during his lifetime, biology as a science was less developed and popular than chemistry and physics. But over time, progress put her on a par with them, so the Swedish Academy of Sciences began to include candidates in related disciplines in the list.

Non-obvious forecasts

ChemistryViews, a free online service run by European chemists and other scientists from 16 European chemical societies, held a vote ahead of the award: who could become a laureate? This resource is not an authoritative predictor of the Nobel Prize results, but the forecasts of authoritative experts in the previous two days were also largely unfulfilled. However, ChemistryViews candidates look quite interesting.

The most votes were collected by the famous researcher of polymer materials, the Pole Krzysztof Matyashevsky, who discovered simple polymerization method. His method makes it possible to obtain diverse paint and varnish materials and can be used for medical purposes, for example, for bone regeneration.

Second place belongs to the American chemist Omar Yaghi. He is one of the five most cited chemists in the world. His works are dedicated organometallic chemistry. Among his latest projects, for example, was a device that allows you to extract water vapor from the air using sunlight and heat, and accumulate this moisture inside a porous material. Such materials can be used to purify air. And this year, he and colleagues from the University of Berkeley presented a new version of “magic sand” that allows you to extract moisture from desert sand.

Swiss chemist Michael Grätzel, one of the creators of the so-called Gretzel cells. This invention has the potential to be a very beneficial alternative to expensive and complex photovoltaic battery technologies. Interestingly, Gretzel's work in recent years has focused on perovskites, a class of materials that are now being actively considered as a major technology for storing solar energy. In scientific circles, work with perovskites has already been awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics this year.

Other predictions

The scientific portal Inside Science predicts that this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry could go to American Jennifer Doudna, a biochemist from the University of California at Berkeley, Frenchwoman Emmanuelle Charpentier, who heads the Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, and Chinese-American biochemist Feng Zhang from Harvard.

All three are involved in CRISPR. This DNA editing method, which is considered one of the most important scientific discoveries in modern genetics. CRISPR technology makes it possible to make changes to the genomes of higher organisms and, in the future, possibly correct incorrect gene sequences and treat hereditary human diseases. However, there are studies that indicate serious side effects of the technology, so it still requires study and development.

Other Nobel Prize winners include English chemist Stanley Whittingham, now at Binghamton University in New York, physicist John Goodenough of the University of Texas at Austin, and chemist Akira Yoshino of Meiji University in Japan. These three scientists were developing lithium-ion batteries. It is believed that such batteries are much more compact than conventional ones and at the same time store more energy.

Inside Science also notes the work of American chemist Barry Sharpless. True, the scientist has already received the Nobel Prize once: in 2001, he and two other scientists were awarded for creating an oxidation reaction with chiral catalysis, which made it possible to create new drugs. But behind Sharpless there is another important discovery for medicine - " click chemistry", which significantly reduces the time of drug development. The fact that Sharpless could receive a second Nobel has been talked about for several years. In the entire history of the award, only four scientists have received such an honor.

The laureates were also selected by Clarivate Analytics experts. Their assumptions differ from Inside Science. In their forecasts, they rely on the names of scientists who are most often cited in scientific publications.

This year they honored chemist Eric Jacobsen of Harvard University. He may be awarded for development of catalytic reactions for organic synthesis, and also for the development of the Jacobsen epoxidation reaction. The scientist discovered it in 1994.

Another possible recipient of the award is chemist George M. Sheldrick, professor emeritus at the Georg-August University of Göttingen. According to Google, Sheldrick became the most cited scientist in 2015, with more than 220,000 links to him on the Web. The Nobel Prize may go to Sheldrick for his enormous influence on structural crystallography- the science that studies crystals. And also for the use of crystallography in the SHELX computer program system. With this free program, anyone can process and visualize crystallographic data.

Finally, Clarivate Analytics recognizes another scientist, Joanne Stubb of MIT, for her discovery. mechanism of ribonucleotide reductases(these are enzymes). This mechanism accelerates DNA synthesis and repair. If Stabe wins the award, she will become the fifth woman to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. And this too will be more of a “biological” victory.

The Nobel Prize is the highest award given for achievements in science, inventions and contributions to culture, as well as for the development of society. The tradition of rewarding people for their work contributing to the progress of mankind was introduced on the basis of Nobel's will. So, for what can you get the Nobel Prize, which implies the presentation of not only a memorial sign, but also a significant cash prize amounting to more than $1 million. The award is given to specialists in physics, chemistry, literature, economics, medicine, as well as for establishing peace on earth.

How to get a Nobel Prize?

People who were able to make a discovery receive such a global award, and for this they need to go through a certain path. What does it take to win a Nobel Prize:

1. You need to start by obtaining higher education in the areas that were listed earlier. You will have to complete your master's degree and defend your dissertation.
2. Having a candidate or doctorate degree, you need to make a discovery that will be useful for the whole world. As for literature, the work must be original and stand out from everyone else in some way. You should not expect that immediately after this you will be included in the list of applicants, since usually about 30 years pass from the moment of opening until the receipt of the award.
3. After the discovery is made, you need to work on your popularity, since at least 600 leading experts should know about your work. To do this, you need to participate in various exhibitions, presentations, publish in newspapers and magazines, etc. Fame is needed so that during a survey conducted by the Nobel Committee, professionals in their field will mention you as a worthy participant.
4. After this, the Nobel Committee and the Swedish Academy of Sciences conduct numerous consultations with various experts and the most worthy applicants are selected from the list obtained through a survey. After this, a vote takes place, in which members of the Nobel Committee participate, which makes it possible to determine the laureates. If a person gets on this list, he will soon receive a notification and can prepare for the Nobel lecture.

Speaking about how to get a Nobel Prize in economics, physics and other sciences, it will be interesting to look into the existing predictions by scientists for the future. For example, in physics you shouldn’t expect major discoveries in the coming years, since only the existing theory is being strengthened and expanded. Unfavorable forecasts in chemistry, so, according to the committee, it is no longer possible to make any discoveries. Biology has the greatest prospects for truly brilliant discoveries. Almost all research is carried out in the field of clones and genes.

It will also be interesting to know where the Nobel Prize is received and when the ceremony takes place. So, they gather the laureates for the awards on December 10, the day of Nobel’s death, in the capital of Sweden at the Royal Academy of Music, but the Peace Prize is given in the capital of Norway. For several years now, the Peace Prize has been awarded not for what has already been done, but for future achievements that will improve life.

Why don't mathematicians win the Nobel Prize?

Many are surprised by this fact, but Alfred Nobel himself decided so. There are several versions of why this happened. For example, mathematicians say that the scientist simply forgot to dictate it to the secretary, indicating the list of sciences for which a prize is worth giving, believing that this goes without saying. Some argue that Alfred excluded mathematics quite deliberately, since when creating dynamite, he did not use it, which means that science is completely unnecessary. According to the third version, having forgotten about mathematics, Nobel took revenge on his wife’s admirer, who was a famous professor of this particular science.

How to get a bonus

You can receive a bonus from your boss in several ways. Let's voice them.

1. The most effective way is to ask for another overtime or additional project. You can justify your request by the fact that you have limited funds and want to increase your salary. Otherwise, your boss may get the impression that you have a lot of free time and just want to increase the amount of work. It is also better to stay after work for a while, let other employees see your zeal and desire to earn money. Undoubtedly, the people who are present in any organization will report this to senior management. Even if you cope with extra work during working hours, do not rush to show it to others. Everything must be thought out. Otherwise, your boss will get the impression that you previously had a small amount of work and you need to increase it without an additional bonus. It is also necessary to tell others and management that you are taking work home. The main thing is to talk about yourself, because many may simply not notice your work. There is also a position among bosses that the one who knows how to give arguments and arguments in their favor is more competent. So don't be shy to defend your point of view.
2. The second way is to come up with a new idea, a new project and ask management that you will lead it. First you need to think about everything.
3. The traditional method, but not particularly effective, is to make a report on the work done and show management what you are doing, as they say, “in all its glory.” That you are busy and need additional material stimulation.

You can choose a reward that your staff will appreciate, make a rating of gifts that should be forgotten forever, take the Gerchikov test and find out what motivational type your managers are.

A survey conducted by HeadHunter in 2016 among 1,800 heads of Russian organizations showed that employee productivity is falling.

According to employers, the reasons are lack of motivation (76%) and low qualifications of management (67%) 1 . To motivate staff, companies use various reward options. At the same time, the capabilities of employers do not coincide with the expectations of employees (picture 1).What can you give bonuses for? in 2017, so as not to demotivate the staff?

Best article of the month

If you do everything yourself, employees will not learn how to work. Subordinates will not immediately cope with the tasks that you delegate, but without delegation you are doomed to time trouble.

We have published in this article a delegation algorithm that will help you free yourself from routine and stop working around the clock. You will learn who can and cannot be entrusted with work, how to correctly assign a task so that it is completed, and how to supervise personnel.

1 Data from a HeadHunter survey among executives of Russian companies (2016).

Employees' opinions. In 2015, 92% of working Russians believed that they deserved an annual bonus. But only 24% of employees waited until their thirteenth salary, and 76% were left without additional remuneration. The number of respondents who attribute the lack of bonuses to the unstable position of the company increased from 11 to 18% between 2010 and 2015.

Conclusion. According to analysts from the Superjob.ru portal, annual bonuses are no longer effective. Employees take the thirteenth salary for granted and do not strive to improve their performance in order to receive it. The lack of a bonus also does not motivate employees to increase their productivity. Instead of bonus payments to all staff, introduce individual rewards for the best employees.

Expert opinion

Show employees that they have to work hard to get the benefits.

Natalya Rushkevich,

Director of HR and Corporate Communications at LiveTex

We divide the IT department employees into teams. Once every two weeks, two “Pokémon” are played among the participants in each of them. The first is internal. All team members write on a piece of paper the name of a colleague who accomplished a work feat: found a bug in the product that no one noticed, or taught employees something. The one who receives the most votes in a secret ballot earns a “Pokémon”. This is a card with a Pokémon Go character on one side and his description and story on the other. The second “Pokemon” is external. Each team collectively chooses a member of the other group whom they would like to reward for their help.

Players can exchange Pokémon for various types of rewards. For example, you can get free pizza, books, fruit, or a day of work in the CTO's office.

Result. The employees of the department have rallied and are trying to help each other. Over the three months of the game, the level of engagement of IT department employees in their work has noticeably increased.

Corporate events

Employers' opinion. According to managers, among the most effective methods of remuneration are corporate events at the end of the year (59% of respondents think so) (Figure 3). An expert in the development of HR strategies, Evgeniy Dotsenko, claims: in 2016, 21% of companies reduced costs for corporate events in order to save budget. But as soon as organizations can afford to spend money on holidays for staff, the fashion for corporate parties will return again.

Employees' opinions. According to research, staff do not need corporate events (Figure 3). Only 3% of employees value this type of work reward. According to employees of companies from various business sectors whom we surveyed in December 2016, few people are ready to have fun at corporate events with colleagues or managers. Therefore, such events depress the staff.

Conclusion. If 15 years ago employees liked general holidays and motivated them to work better at the end of the year, then in 2016 corporate events turned into a duty. Employees would prefer to receive a bonus or an additional day off instead of a corporate party.

• Motivation of sales managers: advice from professionals

Trainings

Employers' opinion. According to a study by the portal Superjob.ru (2016), no more than half of Russian companies set aside a budget for personnel training (Figure 4). Industrial organizations, IT firms, retailers, hotels and catering businesses train employees more actively than other companies. Less attention is paid to the professional development of employees in transport and logistics companies.

At the same time, 51% of organizations allocate a maximum of 10% of the HR budget for personnel training, 14% - from 30% and above, 76% - from 11 to 30%.

Employees' opinions. According to the KD survey, for 43% of respondents, professional development within the company is an important type of reward for quality work. Employees are willing to learn to take on challenging tasks and advance their careers. For 25% of employees, professional growth is more important than material bonuses.

Conclusion. Professional development of staff is effective: employees willingly attend seminars. If employers do not help subordinates improve their skills, employees leave the company (Figure 5). For example, Electrolux Corporation has reduced staff turnover by 90% through regular training.

Payment for voluntary health insurance, communications, travel, food

Employers' opinion. In addition to monetary rewards, 95% of companies use other incentives. According to 47% of employers, payment for mobile communications is among the most effective factors (Figure 3). Ekaterina Gorokhova, CEO of the recruiting agency Kelly Services, believes that such motivation methods were popular 15-17 years ago and companies are in no hurry to change them.

At the same time, only a fifth of employers believe that paying for voluntary health insurance, food and travel on public transport can motivate staff to improve the quality of work. These incentive methods are quite expensive, so companies are skeptical about them.

Employees' opinions. According to a survey by the portal Superjob.ru for 2016, employees expect companies to provide a free voluntary health insurance policy (37% of respondents) and payment for meals (28%). But staff are not inspired to pay for mobile communications (Figure 3).

Conclusion. Employees do not agree with employers' views on additional motivators. According to a Kelly Services survey, in 2016, employees were more likely to be inspired by large-scale and interesting tasks (40% of respondents) and a comfortable atmosphere in the company (36%). In return, employees want to receive free medical care and food, travel allowances, etc.

• Motivating sales staff: an algorithm that increases sales by up to 40%

Rewarding sales managers with certificates

Employers' opinion. According to HeadHunter, 30% of companies use negative incentives: threats of dismissal, increasing the workload per employee (Figure 6). Only 13% of employers publicly praise and thank their subordinates. Reason: 57% of managers believe that laziness prevents staff from working harder. Therefore, non-material rewards in the form of gratitude are not accepted in companies.

Employees' opinions. Employees regard inattention from management as a reason for dismissal (Figure 5). If employees do not feel supported by the company and are not confident in the correctness of their actions, then their motivation drops. A friendly team and a team in which it is comfortable to work are in first place for staff among non-material ways of motivation.

Conclusion. It is important for employees to feel the significance of their contribution to the common cause. So instead of using the stick, check in with your employees regularly. Discuss and evaluate staff performance at meetings. In Western companies, for example, top managers hold weekly one-hour individual meetings with subordinates and find out how things are going, what they like and don’t like about work, what the employee is going to do, whether he fits into the development schedule, what issues need help, etc. .

Find out about three additional ways to reward employees at the end of the article.