Kiiko Mikhail. Mikhail Kiyko about work at the head of the united kingdom. According to operational information from the Federal Tax Service

In this, Mr. Kiiko is helped by his partners from the Alliance Legal company, to which money is transferred from OZK, contrary to the guidelines of the supervisory agency. Alliance Legal is associated with retired General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Nikolai Ovchinnikov. We will report separately on the connections of the “Uncle Kolya clan” in arbitration courts; the information will be addressed, among other things, to the deputy chairman of the Supreme Court - head of the board for economic disputes, Oleg Sviridenko.

The editors of Kompromat-Ural reported that a year ago a group of employees of the Prosecutor General’s Office from the department for supervision of compliance with anti-corruption legislation visited OZK. The inspection was led by the head of the department, Alexander Rusetsky, the commission included his deputy Valery Volkov, who later moved to the position of assistant to Yuri Chaika, and several other competent supervisors. A copy of the certificate from the Prosecutor General’s Office dated September 8, 2017 on the results of the anti-corruption audit of the company headed by Kiiko is available in the editorial office of Kompromat-Ural.

The audit showed that OZK has created a vicious system of corruption risks and costs to “pump” money from an enterprise in which the state owns a “golden share” and which is vested with the powers of a state agent in the grain market. One of the channels for diverting funds is the conclusion and payment of dubious contracts with supposedly “sole suppliers” (individuals and legal entities) for the same work and services that employees of numerous departments of OZK must perform for a salary within the framework of their staffing schedules and job descriptions . In essence, there is double payment for the same functions.

What makes the audit of the Prosecutor General’s Office especially scandalous is the fact that the money from the grain company is received through a “murky” scheme by the law firm Alliance Legal, mentioned in the prosecutor’s report. Kiiko’s personal connection with this commercial structure can be traced long before his appointment to OZK. Thus, in 2016, Kiiko tried to refute publications that after his dismissal from the State Drug Control Service, he, a millionaire general, “was eager to become a deputy” to the head of the newly created National Guard, Viktor Zolotov. As a result, first the Meshchansky District Court of the capital, and then both instances of the Moscow City Court rejected Kiiko’s claim against the journalists. The plaintiff was represented by Ignat Gornshtein (formerly Mirgorodsky, TIN 667306120126) from the same Alliance Legal company.

Apparently, Mirgorodsky renamed himself Gornshtein after he became notorious in 2007 and 2011 as a defendant in a criminal case regarding a particularly large-scale fraud in Pavel Fedulev’s group. Now that same loyalist Gornstein, ex-Mirgorodsky, acts as a representative of Kiyko - already the general director of OZK (half owned by the beneficiary of the Summa group, Ziyavudin Magomedov) - demands from the editors of Kompromat-Ural to remove references to the “relationship of financial dependence” between Kiyko and Magomedov. We thank informed readers for their solidarity with our correspondents, we look forward to new messages at: [email protected]

The circumstances of the Kiiko-OZK-Alliance Legal relationship allow observers to raise the question of checking Kiiko for, at a minimum, a conflict of interest with Vladimir Putin’s assistant, the head of the presidential control department, Dmitry Shalkov, and the head of the Kremlin anti-corruption department, Andrei Chobotov. . The legal company that personally served Kiiko is now “planted” with the budget of OZK, which Kiiko heads?

Now let’s return to the similarities between Kiiko and Zabivaka and new scandalous facts about who and how is screwing over the Prosecutor General’s Office. Kompromat-Ural editorial sources in the grain company report that OZK money, despite the harsh conclusions of the supervisory audit, continues to flow into Alliance Legal. In new procurements, this company still appears as the so-called “sole supplier”. That is, in all of multimillion-dollar Moscow, there was no more experienced law firm worthy of a contract with the state grain operator.

Moreover, Alliance Legal is such an outstanding company that all its achievements in obtaining government contracts are limited to tranches only from OZK during the period of Kiiko’s directorship. The symbiosis of the customer and the performer, the only ones for each other. This looks funny, if not (taking into account the state status of the enterprise entrusted to Kiiko) not to say - mockingly blatant! Where is the respect for the institution of the prosecutor's office? Or is her position an empty phrase? Is everyone now allowed to do the same as OZK?

The transfer of money to the lawyers serving Kiiko from OZK is framed in a respectable manner. Probably, in order to give a “solid” appearance to a small law firm, government procurement is denominated in US dollars (25,000 USD, procurement numbers: 31705347417, 31705347267 dated July 21, 2017). Well, it’s not just some Moscow company “Alliance Legal”, registered 2.5 years ago, but an international consulting company with a worldwide reputation - it takes payment only in “greens”!

Just the facts, or to whom and the Prosecutor General’s Office is not a decree

So, in July 2017, employees of the Prosecutor General’s Office caught OZK in a corrupt scheme of transferring money to the Alliance Legal law office for those legal services that should be provided by full-time specialists, divisions and departments subordinate to Kiiko. Supervisors qualified this fact as “restricting competition, generating corruption risks” and “duplicating functions for performing work by the only suppliers and structural divisions” of the company. Law enforcement officers reproached Mr. Kiiko for failing to take “measures aimed at cutting costs.”

A year has passed: how did UZK, led by Mikhail Kiiko, react? On July 6, 2018, OZK makes its next purchase (number 31806695585) from the “sole supplier” - the beloved law firm Alliance Legal. A deliberately non-competitive agreement in the amount of 1 million 27 thousand rubles is concluded with the manager of the bureau, Artyom Grishin (TIN 667410030694). The subject of the agreement is the representation of the interests of "OZK" in litigation, i.e. again the same thing for which OZK has permanent personnel specialists on its payroll. Even the draft agreement (file HERE) is placed in the procurement system immediately with the Alliance Legal logo - is Kiiko and his lawyers so tightly grasped everything? The signature column from the “OZK” indicates the deputy of Kiykin, Maxim Tsyganov, but this is rather a formality.

Observers of the portal “Kompromat-Ural” were even more interested in finding out what exactly “OZK” is agreeing to generously pay “Alliance Legal” for in the new tranche, not paying attention to the introductory notes from the Prosecutor General’s Office. It turns out that this is participation in “disputes about the protection of business reputation” over online publications. According to practicing lawyers, the conditions are very tasty: $250 (dollars again!) for each hour of work, $1000 for each court hearing, $5000 for one court instance. Payment - monthly. In addition to these exorbitant amounts, “on the basis of a separate invoice,” OZK pays travel expenses to third-party lawyers (“even if the trip lasts less than 24 hours”)! And so money transfers from the company entrusted to Kiiko to Alliance Legal can grow indefinitely: state duties, postal, notary expenses, “the work of hired specialists”, as well as (attention!) “all other documented expenses”...

True, the agreement contains many beautiful words about how the parties will comply with anti-corruption principles, but this causes nothing but laughter. What kind of anti-corruption behavior can we talk about if, taking into account all the above facts, the scheme of relations between “OZK” and “Alliance Legal” initially included obvious corruption risks (confirmed by the Prosecutor General’s Office)!

Does Kiiko pay? Or is this a corporate “common fund”?

A noteworthy clause in the agreement is that the city of the trial is indicated, for which new millions will be withdrawn from the OZK account. This is Yekaterinburg. But here the company itself has no business protecting its business reputation! But in Yekaterinburg, an individual, Mikhail Yuryevich Kiyko, is now “laundering” his personal image, denying that there was a “relationship of financial dependence” between him and Ziyavudin Magomedov. The claim looks far-fetched: Magomedov half owns OZK, and Kiiko is a hired top manager at this enterprise. In such a situation, an innocent phrase about a “relationship of financial dependence” between Kiiko and Magomedov is unlikely to threaten Kiiko’s reputation. Moreover, when the media contains a lot of other, much more negative and caustic statements about his connections with the founder of the Summa group, even criminal ones. Why throw a lot of money at a strange Ekaterinburg lawsuit?! Or was there a plan to quietly judge the convenient wording in Themis’s decision, without objections from the opposite side, and, moreover, without a surge in new publications? If this was the plan, then Kiiko’s advisers failed the boss: everything turned out quite the opposite.

From an anti-corruption standpoint, it is important to find out from whose pocket is actually paying for the enactment of the “judicial performance” in Kiiko’s personal interests? Let's compare the facts. The above-mentioned non-competitive million-dollar purchase from OZK funds in the Alliance Legal bureau, which was objected to by the Prosecutor General’s Office a year ago, was dated July 6, 2018. One gets the impression that they were in a hurry to get the tranche ready for the consideration of the case in Yekaterinburg. After all, less than a week later, on July 12, 2018, Nikita Rozhentsov, another representative with a power of attorney personally from citizen Kiiko, appeared before arbitration judge Elena Seliverstvoy.

He, like Ignat Gornshtein, who was prosecuted, is also from the Alliance Legal company. Rozhentsov’s behavior from the outside looked as if the decision of the Sverdlovsk court in favor of his client was predetermined. Even a simple question before the judge, whether Kiiko or his representatives contacted the publication for pre-trial correction of the “offensive” publication (or is it only important for them to pretend to “defend their honor” for the sake of spending money on legal services), caused a grin and Rozhentsov’s demonstrative refusal to answer on the merits.

We contact Rosfinmonitoring, the Federal Tax Service and the Accounts Chamber: did citizen Mikhail Kiyko pay for the services of his personal legal representatives or were they automatically credited with the money that from the state company OZK, where Kiyko is director, goes to Alliance Legal, where Kiyko’s employees work? lawyers? Are there fixed confirmations of such payment (for example, bank transactions, and not some kind of fiddling letters that can be drawn up on the knee any retroactively)? Fundamental point! After all, the personal claim of the “honest and law-abiding” Kiiko should in no way be paid from the money of the “OZK”, which he was put in charge of. This is not why he was entrusted with a position in a strategic joint-stock company of the Russian Federation. As we can see from recent facts and previous conclusions of the Prosecutor General’s Office, there are quite grounds for suspicion of using a “common pot”.

Who are Alliance Legal?

The owner of the law office working for Mikhail Kiyko, together with the above-mentioned Artyom Grishin, is Nikolai Popov (TIN 667113697710). The Loyers did not hesitate to abandon their legal entities, which the tax authorities then had to liquidate as inactive at the expense of the budget. This is how Grishin, the founder and director, died of Zlatogorka Company LLC (TIN 6670072403). Before Grishin, the legal entity in turn belonged to the notorious Maxim Ryapasov, Oleg Isakov and Vyacheslav Latypov, who, together with Ignat Gornshtein (formerly Mirgorodsky) from Alliance Legal, was a defendant in the case of particularly serious crimes of Pavel Fedulev’s group.

Grishinsky partner Nikolai Popov had also previously left the company Tagiltorg (TIN 6623042225), which he headed and was a co-owner until his last day. Twice as large a share in Tagiltorg LLC belonged to Andrey Akhtyamov (TIN 665900524956), who appeared in a high-profile story about the redistribution of property in the industrial holding Uralinvestenergo.

The editors of Kompromat-Ural thank the readers for the information provided (feedback address: [email protected]) and continues a public investigation into the activities of Mikhail Kiyko and his attorney brokers. In addition, we will dwell in more detail on Svetlana Kiyko (TIN 771917271769), Airat Gainetdinov (TIN 616110114935), we will tell you who and why brought Oleg Molibog (TIN 772940391181) to PJSC Novorossiysk Bread Products Plant after the Federation Council and Rosleskhoz. Where did government orders pour into the personal business of the ex-head of the Moscow Federal Drug Control Service, Ivan Telenkov (TIN 770470810984). Why, after Kiiko’s arrival at OZK, did he desperately need Igor Bozhkov (TIN 312320371147) as his right-hand security guard? And about many other lucky people who, with Kiiko’s arrival in the state grain business, expanded on a grand scale. To be continued…

The United Grain Company (UGC) may be headed by a new general director, market sources familiar with the situation in the company told Interfax.

According to one of them, it is assumed that the current CEO of the company, Mikhail Kiyko, will work until November 1, 2018, then the company will be headed by a new leader.

Another source does not rule out that the current president of the National Union of Fruit and Vegetable Producers, Sergei Korolev, could become the new general director of UZK. Recently, in accordance with the government order, he was nominated to the board of directors of United Grain Company JSC as a candidate from the Russian Federation.

Another source suggested that a change in the company’s management could be a consequence of the situation related to the arrest of Ziyavudin Magomedov, head of the Summa group, which owns 50% minus one share of OZK. When M. Kiyko was appointed to the post of general director of OZK in 2017, sources said that he was a protégé of the Summa group.

In mid-October, RBC, with reference to the former head of Summa, member of the board of directors of UZK Leila Mammed-zade, reported that Summa’s share in the capital of the United Grain Company “will change.” “The “amount” now cannot be useful in the development of this asset,” she said.

Interfax does not yet have any comments from OZK. S. Korolev's phone number is unavailable.

M. Kiyko headed the UGC in April 2017.

S. Korolev was born in 1971. From 2002 to 2009 he worked as deputy director of the Rosagroleasing company. After the appointment of the head of Rosagroleasing, Elena Skrynnik, as Minister of Agriculture in 2009, S. Korolev took over the post of her deputy in the Ministry of Agriculture. Since 2011, he has been director of the investment fund AVG Capital Partners; since 2014, he has headed the National Union of Fruit and Vegetable Producers. He is also the chairman of the public council under the Ministry of Agriculture.

UGC was created on March 20, 2009 to develop the infrastructure of the grain market, realize the export potential of Russian grain, and conduct trade and procurement activities in the domestic grain market. As a contribution to the authorized capital of UZK, the government transferred stakes in 30 enterprises located in 18 regions of the country. The company owns a controlling stake in the Novorossiysk Bakery Plant, which is one of the largest grain terminals in the Russian Federation.

The state owns 50% plus 1 share of OZK. The second shareholder is the Summa group, whose owner Z. Magomedov was arrested at the end of March this year on charges of organizing a criminal community.

The company is included in the privatization plan for 2017-2019. It is assumed that the state will withdraw from the authorized capital of the UGC.

Material from Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia

Mikhail Yurievich Kiyko
since June 11, 2009
The president:	Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin
Birth:	12 May(1967-05-12 ) (51 years old) Ufa, Russian SFSR, USSR
Military service
Years of service:	since 2009
Affiliation:	FSKN
Rank:	Colonel General of Police
Awards:

Mikhail Yuryevich Kiyko(born May 12, 1967, Ufa, Bashkir ASSR, RSFSR, USSR) - Russian statesman, Deputy Director of the Russian Federal Service for Drug Control (since June 11, 2009), Colonel General of Police (June 9, 2011) , Candidate of Economic Sciences.

Biography

Mikhail Yuryevich Kiyko was born on May 12, 1967 in the city of Ufa, Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. From 1988 to 1988 he served in the ranks of the Soviet Army.

During his years of work at Rosrezerv, Kiiko was actively involved in improving his professional qualifications. So, in 2002 he received a diploma from the All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, in 2005 he graduated from the faculty of retraining and advanced training of the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, in 2006 he became a graduate of the Moscow Academy of Finance and Law, and in 2008 he received a degree MBA in the Oil and Gas Business Management program at the Russian State University of Oil and Gas named after I.M. Gubkin.

By decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated June 11, 2009, Kiyko was appointed deputy director of the Federal Service of the Russian Federation for Drug Control. On June 9, 2011, he was awarded the special rank of “Colonel General of Police.”

Military and special ranks, class ranks

Family

Married, has two children - a son and a daughter.

Awards

Write a review of the article "Kijko, Mikhail Yurievich"

Notes

Links

An excerpt characterizing Kiiko, Mikhail Yurievich

- He's coming! - the makhalny shouted at this time.
The regimental commander, blushing, ran up to the horse, with trembling hands took the stirrup, threw the body over, straightened himself, took out his sword and with a happy, decisive face, his mouth open to the side, prepared to shout. The regiment perked up like a recovering bird and froze.
- Smir r r r na! - the regimental commander shouted in a soul-shaking voice, joyful for himself, strict in relation to the regiment and friendly in relation to the approaching commander.
Along a wide, tree-lined, highwayless road, a tall blue Viennese carriage rode in a row at a brisk trot, its springs slightly rattling. Behind the carriage galloped a retinue and a convoy of Croats. Next to Kutuzov sat an Austrian general in a strange white uniform among the black Russians. The carriage stopped at the shelf. Kutuzov and the Austrian general were talking quietly about something, and Kutuzov smiled slightly, while, stepping heavily, he lowered his foot from the footrest, as if these 2,000 people were not there, who were looking at him and the regimental commander without breathing .
A shout of command was heard, and again the regiment trembled with a ringing sound, putting itself on guard. In the dead silence the weak voice of the commander-in-chief was heard. The regiment barked: “We wish you good health, yours!” And again everything froze. At first, Kutuzov stood in one place while the regiment moved; then Kutuzov, next to the white general, on foot, accompanied by his retinue, began to walk along the ranks.
By the way the regimental commander saluted the commander-in-chief, glaring at him with his eyes, stretching out and getting closer, how he leaned forward and followed the generals along the ranks, barely maintaining a trembling movement, how he jumped at every word and movement of the commander-in-chief, it was clear that he was fulfilling his duties subordinate with even greater pleasure than the duties of a superior. The regiment, thanks to the rigor and diligence of the regimental commander, was in excellent condition compared to others who came to Braunau at the same time. There were only 217 people who were retarded and sick. And everything was fine, except for the shoes.
Kutuzov walked through the ranks, occasionally stopping and speaking a few kind words to the officers whom he knew from the Turkish war, and sometimes to the soldiers. Looking at the shoes, he sadly shook his head several times and pointed them out to the Austrian general with such an expression that he didn’t seem to blame anyone for it, but he couldn’t help but see how bad it was. Each time the regimental commander ran ahead, afraid to miss the commander-in-chief's word regarding the regiment. Behind Kutuzov, at such a distance that any faintly spoken word could be heard, walked about 20 people in his retinue. The gentlemen of the retinue talked among themselves and sometimes laughed. The handsome adjutant walked closest to the commander-in-chief. It was Prince Bolkonsky. Next to him walked his comrade Nesvitsky, a tall staff officer, extremely fat, with a kind and smiling handsome face and moist eyes; Nesvitsky could hardly restrain himself from laughing, excited by the blackish hussar officer walking next to him. The hussar officer, without smiling, without changing the expression of his fixed eyes, looked with a serious face at the back of the regimental commander and imitated his every movement. Every time the regimental commander flinched and bent forward, in exactly the same way, in exactly the same way, the hussar officer flinched and bent forward. Nesvitsky laughed and pushed others to look at the funny man.
Kutuzov walked slowly and sluggishly past thousands of eyes that rolled out of their sockets, watching their boss. Having caught up with the 3rd company, he suddenly stopped. The retinue, not anticipating this stop, involuntarily moved towards him.
- Ah, Timokhin! - said the commander-in-chief, recognizing the captain with the red nose, who suffered for his blue overcoat.
It seemed that it was impossible to stretch out more than Timokhin stretched out, while the regimental commander reprimanded him. But at that moment the commander-in-chief addressed him, the captain stood up straight so that it seemed that if the commander-in-chief had looked at him for a little longer, the captain would not have been able to stand it; and therefore Kutuzov, apparently understanding his position and wishing, on the contrary, all the best for the captain, hastily turned away. A barely noticeable smile ran across Kutuzov’s plump, wound-disfigured face.
“Another Izmailovo comrade,” he said. - Brave officer! Are you happy with it? – Kutuzov asked the regimental commander.
And the regimental commander, reflected as in a mirror, invisible to himself, in a hussar officer, shuddered, came forward and answered:
– I am very pleased, Your Excellency.
“We are all not without weaknesses,” said Kutuzov, smiling and moving away from him. “He had a devotion to Bacchus.

— You led the company for about a year and a half. Can I find out what exactly was done within this period?
— Let's start with financial indicators, which can be considered a source of pride for the OZK team. According to preliminary data for 9 months of 2018, unaudited revenue under RAS of the OZK Group amounted to RUB 30.2 billion. At the end of 2018, this figure is projected to be about 40 billion rubles.

The net profit of the OZK Group at the end of 2017 amounted to 2.2 billion rubles, at the end of 2018 it is projected at 4.7 billion rubles.

EBITDA at the end of 2017 was RUB 3,367 million; at the end of 2018 it is expected to be RUB 6,554 million. The Debt/EBITDA ratio at the end of 2017 was 2.6; at the end of 2018 it is expected to be 1.0. These are good indicators.

The volume of port transshipment from 6.1 million tons in 2017 will increase at the end of 2018, according to preliminary estimates, to 6.5 million tons.

The export volume in 2017 was only about 700 thousand tons; by the end of 2018, more than 2 million tons are expected. These are the best performance indicators of the Group since the date of formation of the consolidated financial statements (since 2010).

— What if we take production indicators?
— The company performs the functions of organizing the safety of grain from the state intervention fund and its implementation according to the orders of the Ministry of Agriculture and. In October 2018, exchange trading in grain from the Federal Intervention Fund in the amount of up to 500 thousand tons for export was successfully completed, and just the other day the start of exchange trading in grain in the amount of 1,500 thousand tons took place to support Russian flour millers.

You have repeatedly said that for further growth in grain production, it is necessary to develop the appropriate infrastructure: transportation, port, and elevator capacities. What has been done in this direction?
— A key stage of the investment project for the reconstruction of the port transshipment complex of PJSC "" has been implemented, as a result of which the terminal's capacity for transshipment of grain for export increased by 50% - from 4.2 million tons in 1 quarter. 2017 to 6.4 million tons in Q3. 2018. In 2017-2018, the existing elevator facilities were reconstructed, new grain storage tanks with a volume of 110 thousand tons were built and put into operation, as well as a new complex for receiving grain from railway transport.

It was possible to finally resolve the issue of transferring the terminal's access railway infrastructure to NKHP, which is a key condition for achieving the strategic goal of UZK JSC - the transition to route rail grain shipments.

The high pace of implementation of the investment project allows us to expect that NKHP will receive the first route train with grain by the end of 2019. This project was implemented without stopping the operation of the complex and in conditions of round-the-clock transshipment of record grain harvests for export. According to the results of the 2017/2018 season, the terminal became the largest in Russia with a transshipment volume for export of 6.3 million tons of grain.

In 2017, the formation of its own fleet of 1.5 thousand grain cars was completed; in order to develop competencies in the field of rail transportation, a partnership was created with one of the leading operators in the Russian market of specialized rail grain transportation.

In 2017-2018, a lot of work was also done to develop a large promising project for the construction of a specialized grain terminal in the seaport of Zarubino.

Agreements were concluded with grain-producing regions of Siberia and the Far East on grain supplies, key sections of project documentation were developed, an agreement was concluded with a large bank on loan financing of the project, and resident status of the Free Port of Vladivostok was obtained. The implementation of this long-term project will provide an opportunity for grain producers in Siberia and the Far East to gain access to the markets of the Asia-Pacific region, significantly reducing their logistics leverage. And exports today are the main driver of grain production growth: the country needs 70-75 million tons of grain per year to satisfy all its needs, with a much larger volume of production.

In July, following the results of the 2017-2018 season, the group entered the TOP 10 Russian grain exporters. Has anything changed over the past time?
— If you look at the period a little earlier, in the summer of 2017, the OZK Group ranked 15th in Russia among grain exporters.

As of today, this is a confident 6th place.

The group exports grain to Egypt, Bangladesh, Venezuela, Sudan, Israel, South Africa, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Guinea, Oman, Tanzania, Mozambique, and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

Last week, your statement that in the near future, instead of the Summa group, will become a shareholder of OZK JSC, was refuted by representatives of these organizations. Can you clarify where the truth is?
--I did not make a statement, but made an assumption based on the volume of information and documents that we have been preparing over the past month at the bank’s requests. I must emphasize that this is not a sale, but a transfer of pledged shares of the company.

— Can you comment on the strange information that appeared from time to time that you were allegedly involved in some kind of illegal activity?
— On a number of Internet portals that do not have a media license, and in telegram channels, information has repeatedly appeared about my affiliation with the structures of the Summa group, Ziyavudin Magomedov personally, and participation in some joint illegal actions. On some information resources, the information presented is brought to the point of absurdity.

I officially declare that this was not and is not true. Moreover, these publications are in the nature of “black PR”.

This information, disseminated by individual websites, was the subject of judicial review and was found to be untrue. I hope that in the near future all these publications will receive an appropriate criminal legal assessment. The publications have been removed from the sites that distributed them, or are in the process of being removed. The real results of the company’s work best indicate that the management did everything correctly in terms of implementing the development strategy of UZK JSC. And an excellent foundation has been laid for the future of the company.

On Wednesday, the board of directors of the United Grain Company (owned by the Federal Property Management Agency, a minority stake of 50% minus one share is controlled by the Summa group) will appoint a new general director to replace the outgoing Marat Shaidaev. About it " Agroinvestor" said a source close to one of the shareholders OZK. The new head of the company could be a “person from the civil service” named Kiiko, he said, declining further comments. This is Mikhail Kiyko, former deputy director of the Federal Service for Drug Control (FSKN), explains another Agroinvestor source close to the Ministry of Agriculture. Board of Directors OZK will take place on Wednesday, April 12, he confirms, clarifying that Kiiko is the only candidate proposed for the meeting. An anonymous source says the same thing. OZK, according to whom Kiiko’s candidacy was “preliminarily approved” by the Federal Property Management Agency. It was agreed upon by both shareholders, clarifies a person close to the Ministry of Agriculture. “This is Summa’s man,” one of the sources answered when asked which of the shareholders—the state or the minority shareholder—proposed a candidate for the post of general director. The outgoing Shaidaev is also associated with Summa, which bought the shares OZK in 2012, and is considered an associate of its owner Ziyavudin Magomedov.

Previously considered as a candidate for this position was Dmitry Yuryev, the former deputy minister of agriculture, and until recently the first deputy of Shaidaev, who resigned of his own free will a month ago, one of the sources claims. Yuryev, he adds, was allegedly lobbied for this vacancy by Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich, with whom he worked in the Expert Directorate of the President of Russia when Dvorkovich headed it. Get Yuryev's immediate comment " Agroinvestor" failed.

Press service representative OZK confirmed " Agroinvestor"that the next meeting of the company's board of directors is scheduled for Wednesday. She declined to comment further, saying that all public information will be available following the council meeting.

Mikhail Kiyko is 49 years old. He is a police colonel general who worked as deputy director of the Federal Drug Control Service from 2009 until its abolition in 2016, and an active 3rd class state councilor of Russia. Kiyko graduated from the Moscow Medical Dental Institute, and worked (according to his official biography) “in senior positions” in Russian oil and gas companies - YUKOS, Lukoil and Zarubezhneft. He has an MBA degree in oil and gas business management from the University of Oil and Gas. Gubkin, diplomas from the All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade, the Military Academy of the General Staff, and the Moscow Financial and Legal Academy. At less than 35 years old, Kiiko took the position of deputy director of the Federal Agency for State Reserves, or Rosrezerv, from where he was appointed to the Federal Drug Control Service. After leaving this service, he worked as Deputy Director for General Affairs at the Almaz-Antey military space concern.

Kiiko's wife Svetlana is one of the wealthiest wives of civil servants according to Russian Forbes. In 2014, she earned 548 million rubles. - 156 times more than her husband. According to Forbes and the Vedomosti newspaper, over the years Svetlana Kiyko owned shares in various businesses - the company selling pharmaceuticals and medical products "Alloplant-M", had up to 30% of the shares of "Saratovneftegeofizika" (Mikhail Kiyko also worked in the oil industry sphere), etc. In 2014, she sold a stake in this oil company, as well as the Cascade company. The latter was granted a lease of 21 hectares of forest land in the Rublevskoye Highway area near Moscow. Vedomosti wrote in 2015 that the business was a family one: at first the Kiikos were engaged in ophthalmology, and then they focused on the forestry and oil business. The family invests a lot in charity, Kiiko’s acquaintance previously said. He mentions the construction and reconstruction of four churches in Bashkortostan and Belarus - the homeland of the couple, the purchase of icons and holy relics for these churches, as well as the financing of the Sevastopol Sapun Mountain memorial.

The United Grain Company has no luck with general directors - almost all of them (or temporary ones) change almost every year. Shaidaev worked in the company for a year, and explained his departure to Vedomosti by fulfilling the tasks set by the shareholders for the year, as well as fatigue and “the desire to look around.” He was the second person in recent years who was approved for the position of general director by the Federal Property Management Agency. The first was the current Deputy Minister of Agriculture of Russia Sergei Levin, who worked in