Weakness syndrome and sinus node dysfunction: causes and development, symptoms and consequences, treatment. Selective If inhibitors Sinus node inhibitors include

Indications for use

Treatment of stable angina in patients with normal sinus rhythm:

If you are intolerant or have contraindications to the use of beta-blockers.
In combination with beta-blockers in case of inadequate control of stable angina on the background of the optimal dose of beta-blocker.

Chronic heart failure:

To reduce the incidence of cardiovascular complications in patients with chronic heart failure, with sinus rhythm and heart rate of at least 70 beats/min.

Description of the effect on the body

Ivabradine is a drug that slows the heart rate, the mechanism of action of which is to selectively and specifically inhibit the If channels of the sinus node, which control spontaneous diastolic depolarization in the sinus node and regulate heart rate. Ivabradine has a selective effect on the sinus node, without affecting the timing of impulses along the intraatrial, atrioventricular and intraventricular pathways, as well as myocardial contractility and ventricular repolarization. Ivabradine may also interact with Ih channels of the retina, similar to the If channels of the heart, involved in the occurrence of temporary changes in the visual perception system due to changes in the retinal reaction to bright light stimuli. Under provoking circumstances, partial inhibition of Ih channels by ivabradine causes the phenomenon of changes in light perception .
Photopsia is characterized by a transient change in brightness in a limited area of ​​the visual field. The main pharmacological feature of ivabradine is its ability to dose-dependently reduce heart rate.
An analysis of the dependence of the magnitude of the decrease in heart rate on the dose of the drug was carried out with a gradual increase in the dose of ivabradine to 20 mg 2 times a day and revealed a tendency to achieve a plateau effect, which reduces the risk of developing severe bradycardia. When the drug is prescribed in recommended doses, the degree of decrease in heart rate depends on its initial value and is approximately 10-15 beats/min at rest and during physical activity.
As a result, the work of the heart decreases and the myocardium’s need for oxygen decreases.
Ivabradine does not affect intracardiac conduction, myocardial contractility, or the process of repolarization of the ventricles of the heart.
In clinical electrophysiological studies, ivabradine had no effect on the timing of impulses along the atrioventricular or intraventricular pathways, as well as on corrected QT intervals.
In studies involving patients with left ventricular dysfunction of 30-45%), it was shown that ivabradine does not affect myocardial contractility. It was found that ivabradine at a dose of 5 mg 2 times a day improved the performance of stress tests after 3-4 weeks of therapy.
Efficacy was also confirmed for a dose of 7.5 mg 2 times a day.
In particular, an additional effect when increasing the dose from 5 mg to 7.5 mg 2 times / day was established in a comparative study with atenolol.
The time for performing physical activity increased by approximately 1 min after just 1 month of using ivabradine at a dose of 5 mg 2 times a day, while after an additional 3-month course of taking ivabradine at a dose of 7.5 mg 2 times a day orally, a further increase in this indicator by 25 was noted sec.
The antianginal and anti-ischemic efficacy of ivabradine was also confirmed in patients aged 65 years and older.
The effectiveness of ivabradine when used in doses of 5 mg and 7.5 mg 2 times a day was noted in these studies in relation to all indicators of stress tests, and was also accompanied by a decrease in the incidence of angina attacks by approximately 70%.
The use of ivabradine 2 times a day provided constant therapeutic efficacy for 24 hours. In patients taking ivabradine, additional effectiveness of ivabradine was shown in relation to all indicators of stress tests when added to the maximum dose of atenolol at a decline in therapeutic activity. There is no improvement in the effectiveness of ivabradine when added to the maximum dose of amlodipine at the decline in therapeutic activity, while at the maximum of activity the additional effectiveness of ivabradine has been proven. In clinical efficacy studies of the drug, the effects of ivabradine were fully maintained over the 3- and 4-month treatment periods.
During treatment, there were no signs of the development of tolerance, and after cessation of treatment, no withdrawal syndrome was observed.
The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of ivabradine were associated with a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate, as well as a significant decrease in work product, both at rest and during physical activity.
The effect on blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance was minor and clinically insignificant.
A sustained reduction in heart rate has been demonstrated in patients taking ivabradine for at least 1 year.
No effect on carbohydrate metabolism and lipid profile was observed. In patients with diabetes mellitus, the efficacy and safety of ivabradine were similar to those in the general patient population.
There were no differences between the groups of patients taking ivabradine against the background of standard therapy, and in patients with stable angina and left ventricular dysfunction, 86.9% of whom received beta-blockers, and placebo, in the total incidence of deaths from cardiovascular diseases, hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for new cases of heart failure or worsening symptoms of chronic heart failure and in the subgroup of patients with a heart rate of at least 70 beats/min. The use of ivabradine in patients with a heart rate of at least 70 beats/min showed a reduction in the frequency of hospitalizations for fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction by 36% and the frequency of revascularization by 30%. In patients with angina pectoris while taking ivabradine, there was a reduction in the relative risk of complications by 24%.
The noted therapeutic benefit is achieved primarily by reducing the frequency of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction by 42%. Reducing the frequency of hospitalization for fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in patients with heart rate more than 70 beats/min.
even more significant and reaches 73%.
In general, the drug was well tolerated and safe. When using ivabradine in patients with CHF II-IV functional class according to the NYHA classification with LVEF less than 35%, a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the relative risk of complications by 18% was shown.
The absolute risk reduction was 4.2%.
A pronounced therapeutic effect was observed 3 months from the start of therapy. A decrease in mortality from cardiovascular diseases and a decrease in the frequency of hospitalizations due to increased symptoms of CHF was observed regardless of age, gender, functional class of CHF, the use of beta-blockers, ischemic or non-ischemic etiology of CHF, the presence of diabetes mellitus or a history of arterial hypertension. Patients with symptoms of CHF in sinus rhythm and with a heart rate of at least 70 beats/min received standard therapy, including the use of beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, diuretics and aldosterone antagonists. It has been shown that the use of ivabradine for 1 year can prevent one death or one hospitalization due to cardiovascular disease for every 26 patients taking the drug. The use of ivabradine has shown an improvement in the functional class of CHF according to the NYHA classification. In patients with a heart rate of 80 beats/min, a decrease in heart rate by an average of 15 beats/min was noted.

Contraindications to the drug

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Concomitant use with strong inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme system, such as azole antifungals, macrolide antibiotics, HIV protease inhibitors and nefazodone.
Lactase deficiency, lactose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption syndrome.
.
.
.
Hypersensitivity to ivabradine or any component of the drug.

WITH caution the drug should be prescribed for moderately severe liver failure, severe renal failure, congenital prolongation of the QT interval, concomitant use of drugs that prolong the QT interval, concomitant use of moderate inhibitors of the CYP 3A4 isoenzyme and grapefruit juice, asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, AV block of the second degree, recently history of stroke, pigmentary retinal degeneration, arterial hypotension, simultaneous use with blockers of “slow” calcium channels that reduce heart rate, such as verapamil or diltiazem.

Side effects on the body

The drug was studied in studies involving almost 14,000 patients. The most common side effects of ivabradine were dose-dependent and related to the mechanism of action of the drug.

The frequency of adverse reactions that were noted in clinical studies is given in the following gradation: very often; often; infrequently; rarely; very rarely; unspecified frequency.

From the side of the organ of vision:
Very often - changes in light perception.

The following adverse events identified in clinical studies occurred with equal frequency in both the group of patients receiving ivabradine and in the comparison group, which suggests their connection with the disease itself and not with taking ivabradine: sinus arrhythmia, angina pectoris, incl. h. unstable, atrial fibrillation, myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction and ventricular tachycardia.

Cautions for use

During pregnancy:

Coraxan ® is contraindicated for use during pregnancy. At the moment, there is insufficient data on the use of the drug during pregnancy.

Preclinical studies of ivabradine revealed embryotoxic and teratogenic effects.

The use of Coraxan ® during breastfeeding is contraindicated. There is no information on the penetration of ivabradine into breast milk.

Heart rhythm disturbances:

Coraxan ® is not effective for the treatment or prevention of arrhythmias. Its effectiveness decreases against the background of the development of tachyarrhythmia. The drug is not recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation or other types of arrhythmias associated with sinus node function.

During therapy, patients should be clinically monitored for atrial fibrillation. When clinically indicated, routine monitoring should include an ECG.

Use in patients with bradycardia:

Coraxan ® is contraindicated if, before starting therapy, the resting heart rate is less than 60 beats/min. If, during therapy, heart rate at rest decreases to values ​​less than 50 beats/min, or the patient experiences symptoms associated with bradycardia, it is necessary to reduce the dose of the drug. If, when the dose of the drug is reduced, the heart rate remains less than 50 beats/min, or symptoms associated with bradycardia persist, then taking Coraxan ® should be discontinued.

Combined use as part of antianginal therapy:

The use of Coraxan ® in combination with blockers of “slow” calcium channels that reduce heart rate, such as verapamil or diltiazem, is not recommended.

With the combined use of ivabradine with nitrates and blockers of “slow” calcium channels - dihydropyridine derivatives, such as amlodipine, no changes in the safety profile of the therapy were noted. It has not been established that combined use with blockers of “slow” calcium channels increases the effectiveness of ivabradine.

Functions of visual perception:

Coraxan ® affects the function of the retina. Currently, no toxic effects of ivabradine on the retina have been identified, but the effect of the drug on the retina with long-term use is currently unknown. If visual impairments that are not described in these instructions occur, you should consider stopping taking the drug Coraxan ® . Patients with retinal pigmentary degeneration should take Coraxan ® with caution.

Excipients:

The drug contains lactose, therefore Coraxan ® is not recommended for patients with lactase deficiency, lactose intolerance, or glucose-galactose malabsorption syndrome.

Arterial hypotension:

Due to insufficient clinical data, the drug should be prescribed with caution to patients with arterial hypotension.

Coraxan ® is contraindicated in cases of severe arterial hypotension.

Atrial fibrillation - cardiac arrhythmias:

There is no proven increase in the risk of developing severe bradycardia while taking the drug Coraxan ® when restoring sinus rhythm during pharmacological cardioversion. However, due to the lack of sufficient data, if it is possible to delay electrical cardioversion, Coraxan ® should be discontinued 24 hours before it is performed.

Use in patients with congenital long QT syndrome or patients taking drugs that prolong the QT interval:

Coraxan ® should not be prescribed for congenital long QT syndrome, or in combination with drugs that prolong the QT interval. If such therapy is necessary, strict ECG monitoring is necessary.

Moderate liver failure:

In case of moderately severe liver failure, therapy with Coraxan ® should be carried out with caution.

Severe renal failure:

In case of severe renal failure, therapy with Coraxan ® should be carried out with caution.

Impact on the ability to drive vehicles and operate machinery:

The use of the drug Coraxan ® does not impair the quality of driving. Coraxan ® does not affect the ability to drive vehicles or perform work that requires a high speed of psychomotor reactions. However, one should remember about the possibility of photopsia occurring with a sharp change in lighting intensity, especially when driving at night.

How to use

Coraxan ® should be taken orally 2 times a day, morning and evening with meals.

For stable angina pectoris, the recommended initial dose of the drug is 10 mg/day. Depending on the therapeutic effect, after 3-4 weeks of use, the dose of the drug can be increased to 15 mg. If during therapy with Coraxan ® the resting heart rate decreases to values ​​less than 50 beats/min, or the patient experiences symptoms associated with bradycardia, it is necessary to reduce the dose of Coraxan ® 2 times a day). If, when the dose of the drug Coraxan ® is reduced, the heart rate remains less than 50 beats/min or symptoms of severe bradycardia persist, the drug should be discontinued:

If the heart rate is stable no more than 50 beats/min or in case of symptoms of bradycardia such as dizziness, fatigue or arterial hypotension, the dose can be reduced to 2.5 mg 2 times a day.

If the heart rate is in the range from 50 to 60 beats/min, it is recommended to use the drug Coraxan ® at a dose of 5 mg 2 times a day.

If, during the use of the drug, the heart rate at rest is consistently less than 50 beats/min or if the patient has symptoms of bradycardia, for patients receiving the drug Coraxan ® at a dose of 5 mg 2 times / day or 7.5 mg 2 times / day, the dose of the drug should be reduced.

If in patients receiving Coraxan ® at a dose of 2.5 mg 2 times / day or 5 mg 2 times / day, the heart rate at rest is consistently more than 60 beats / min, the dose of the drug can be increased.

If the heart rate is not more than 50 beats/min or the patient continues to have symptoms of bradycardia, the use of the drug should be discontinued.

U patients aged 75 years and older The recommended initial dose of Coraxan ® is 2.5 mg (1/2 tablet of 5 mg) 2 times a day. In the future, it is possible to increase the dose of the drug.

Patients with renal dysfunction with CC more than 15 ml/min The recommended initial dose of Coraxan ® is 10 mg/day (1 tablet 5 mg 2 times/day). Depending on the therapeutic effect, after 3-4 weeks of use, the dose of the drug can be increased to 15 mg (1 tablet 7.5 mg 2 times a day).

Due to the lack of clinical data on the use of the drug Coraxan ® in patients with CC less than 15 ml/min, the drug should be used with caution.

For patients with mild hepatic insufficiency (up to 7 points on the Child-Pugh scale) The usual dosing regimen is recommended. The recommended initial dose of Coraxan ® is 10 mg/day (1 tablet 5 mg 2 times/day). Depending on the therapeutic effect, after 3-4 weeks of use, the dose of the drug can be increased to 15 mg (1 tablet 7.5 mg 2 times a day).

Caution should be exercised when using the drug in patients with moderate liver failure (7-9 points on the Child-Pugh scale).

Coraxan ® is contraindicated in patients with severe liver failure (more than 9 points on the Child-Pugh scale), since the use of the drug in such patients has not been studied (a significant increase in the concentration of the drug in the blood plasma can be expected).

Consequences of incorrect dosage

Symptoms:
Severe and prolonged bradycardia.

Treatment:
Severe bradycardia should be symptomatic and treated in specialized departments. In case of development of bradycardia in combination with hemodynamic disturbances, symptomatic treatment with intravenous administration of beta-adrenergic agonists, such as isoprenaline, is indicated. If necessary, an artificial pacemaker can be installed.

Combination with other medications


The simultaneous use of ivabradine and drugs that prolong the QT interval should be avoided since a decrease in heart rate may cause further prolongation of the QT interval. If it is necessary to prescribe these drugs together, ECG readings should be carefully monitored:

Ivabradine is metabolized in the liver with the participation of isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system and is a very weak inhibitor of this isoenzyme. Ivabradine does not have a significant effect on the metabolism and plasma concentrations of other cytochrome CYP3A4 substrates. At the same time, inhibitors and inducers of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme can interact with ivabradine and have a clinically significant effect on its metabolism and pharmacokinetic properties. It has been found that inhibitors of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme increase, and inducers of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme reduce, plasma concentrations of ivabradine:

Increasing the concentration of ivabradine in blood plasma may increase the risk of developing severe bradycardia.

Contraindicated combinations of drugs:

Concomitant use of ivabradine with potent inhibitors of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, such as azole antifungals, macrolide antibiotics, HIV protease inhibitors and nefazodone is contraindicated. Potent inhibitors of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme - ketoconazole or josamycin - increase the average concentrations of ivabradine in blood plasma by 7-8 times.

Undesirable drug combinations:

The combined use of ivabradine and moderate inhibitors of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme diltiazem or verapamil in healthy volunteers and patients was accompanied by an increase in the AUC of ivabradine by 2-3 times and an additional decrease in heart rate by 5 beats/min. This use is not recommended:

Combinations of drugs that require caution:

Inducers of the CYP3A4 isoenzyme, such as rifampicin, barbiturates, phenytoin and herbal remedies containing St. John's wort, when used together, may lead to a decrease in the blood concentration and activity of ivabradine and require the selection of a higher dose of ivabradine. With the combined use of ivabradine and preparations containing St. John's wort, a twofold decrease in the AUC of ivabradine was noted. During therapy with Coraxan ®, you should, if possible, avoid the use of drugs and products containing St. John's wort:

Combined use with other drugs:

It has been shown that there is no clinically significant effect on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ivabradine with the simultaneous use of the following drugs: proton pump inhibitors, PDE5 inhibitors, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, slow calcium channel blockers - dihydropyridine derivatives, digoxin and warfarin. It has been shown that ivabradine does not have a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of simvastatin, amlodipine, lacidipine, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digoxin, warfarin and the pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid.

Ivabradine has been used in combination with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, short- and long-acting nitrates, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, fibrates, proton pump inhibitors, oral hypoglycemic agents, acetylsalicylic acid and other antiplatelet agents. means. The use of the above drugs was not accompanied by a change in the safety profile of the therapy.

Other interactions requiring caution when used together:

When taking grapefruit juice, there was a 2-fold increase in the concentration of ivabradine in the blood. During therapy with Coraxan ®, you should avoid drinking grapefruit juice if possible:

Trimetazidine (Preductal MB) is a myocardial cytoprotector that optimizes the energy metabolism of cardiomyocytes under conditions of myocardial ischemia by inhibiting beta-oxidation of fatty acids. Provides antianginal and anti-ischemic effects. Can be used as an additional agent and in combination with other antianginal drugs.

Ivabradine (Coraxan) is a selective and specific inhibitor of If channels of the sinoatrial junction, which has an anti-ischemic and antianginal effect due to a decrease in heart rate. Used to monitor heart rate in patients with sinus rhythm when beta blockers and other antianginal drugs are impossible or ineffective.

Keywords: trimetazidine, modified release (MR), antianginal, anti-ischemic effects, If channels, coraxan.

ANTIANGINAL DRUGS WITH METABOLIC ACTION (TRIMETAZIDINE)

In recent years, there has been significant interest in the metabolic approach in the treatment of stable angina. The use of antianginal and anti-ischemic drugs with metabolic action allows one to avoid adverse consequences when prescribing or increasing doses of antianginal drugs with hemodynamic action (nitrovasodilators, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, slow calcium channel blockers).

Mechanism of action of trimetazidine

The antianginal, anti-ischemic, and toprotective effect of trimetazidine is determined (mediated) by the optimization of the energy metabolism of cardiomyocytes under conditions of myocardial ischemia.

The myocardium receives energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecules, which are synthesized directly in cardiomyocytes through the oxidation of energy substrates in mitochondria. ATP consumption in cardiomyocytes is dynamically balanced by its synthesis; Without reproduction of ATP reserves in the cardiomyocyte, there is only enough for a few heartbeats. The main energy substrates for cardiomyocytes are long-chain fatty acids (FA), glucose and lactate (2/3 of ATP are synthesized from FA, 1/3 from glucose and lactate). In cardiomyocytes, glucose undergoes enzymatic glycolytic reactions with the formation of ATP molecules, which maintain the gradient of ions (ionic stability) and the integrity of the cell membrane during ischemia, or, with the formation of pyruvate, which requires less oxygen consumption for metabolism than FA.

Increased oxidation of fatty acids, inhibiting the oxidation of pyruvate in the mitochondria of cardiomyocytes, underlies the decrease in the ability

thy myocardium to resist ischemic cell damage. The accumulation of FAs and their metabolites in cardiomyocytes during hypoxia has cytotoxic effects on cell membranes. Excessive amounts of FA uncouple oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria, further reducing ATP synthesis, disrupting cell contractility and causing irreversible structural changes.

Partial switching of metabolism from the use of the myocardium as an energy substrate of fatty acids to glucose protects cardiomyocytes from ischemic damage and improves the efficiency of the heart. Medicines that can limit the use of fatty acids in favor of glucose oxidation are called cytoprotective anti-ischemic antianginal drugs with a metabolic mechanism of action.

Trimetazidine is a partial inhibitor of beta-oxidation of fatty acids, selectively reducing the activity of DC 3-ketoacyl CoA thiolase, the enzyme beta-oxidation of fatty acids.

Effects of trimetazidine

The use of trimetazidine significantly reduces the frequency of angina attacks, increases the time of exercise, and the time of exercise before the onset of segment depression ST, duration of peak load both in monotherapy and in combination with other antianginal drugs.

An increase in the coronary reserve of patients with coronary artery disease is observed after the 15th day of regular use of the drug.

The combined use of propranolol, as a hemodynamic antianginal drug, with trimetazidine was more effective than the use of propranolol with isosorbide dinitrate, two hemodynamic antianginal drugs, on the number of anginal attacks and the tolerability of the stress test.

The additional antianginal effect of trimetazidine persists with long-term regular use, providing good tolerability and improved quality of life.

Data are reported on the restoration of the function of hibernating myocardium, which can be used for patients who are not subject to angioplasty, or the absence of surgical treatment for ischemic heart disease.

In patients with CHF, the use of trimetazidine led to an improvement in local myocardial contractility, an increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction both at rest and at the peak of pharmacological load, a decrease in the functional class of angina pectoris and CHF, and an increase in the 6-minute walking distance.

Trimetazidine has 2 dosage forms: a regular release form and a modified (slow) release form (preductal MB). Preductal MB has pharmacokinetic and clinical advantages over the conventional dosage form of trimetazidine, providing additional antianginal and anti-ischemic effects throughout the day with control of ischemia in the early morning hours.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of the modified release form of trimetazidine - preductal MB

The modified trimetazidine release form of the dosage form of preductal MB allows maintaining the therapeutic concentration of the active substance for 11 hours at the level of 75% of the maximum, which allows the drug to be used 2 times a day to maintain a more stable trimetazidine concentration throughout the day compared to the conventional release form of the active substance . The hydrophilic matrix of the dosage form of Preductal MB, upon contact with the liquid of the gastrointestinal tract after swelling, turns into a gel, forming a kind of barrier that controls the release of trimetazidine and ensures the uniformity and duration of action of the drug. The bioavailability of the drug does not depend on food intake. A stable concentration of the active substance is achieved 2-3 days after the start of regular use of the drug.

The volume of distribution of the drug is 4.8 l/kg, which suggests good diffusion of trimetazidine into tissue. Binding to serum proteins is low, which ensures the safety of combination therapy with other classes of pharmacological agents. There are no drug interactions described for trimetazidine.

Trimetazidine is excreted mainly by the kidneys unchanged. The half-life is 7 hours, increasing to 12 hours in patients over 65 years of age. The renal clearance of trimetazidine directly correlates with creatinine clearance.

Hepatic clearance decreases with age. The drug is not recommended for patients with renal failure with creatinine clearance less than 15 ml/min, as well as for patients with severe liver dysfunction.

Currently, no cases of drug overdose have been reported.

Teratogenic effects have not been established in experimental studies.

Trimetazidine does not affect the ability to drive a car or perform work that requires a high speed of psychomotor reactions.

Indications for use of trimetazidine

Preductal MB is the most studied drug with proven antianginal and anti-ischemic effects.

Currently, this is the only myocardial cytoprotector recommended by experts from cardiological societies in Russia, Europe, and America for the treatment of angina pectoris. According to Russian recommendations, the drug can be prescribed at any stage of the treatment of stable angina to enhance the antianginal effectiveness of beta blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates to all patients with stable angina pectoris.

If it is impossible to prescribe antianginal classes of drugs with hemodynamic action (beta-blockers, calcium antagonists and nitrates), trimetazidine can take place in the treatment of angina in combination with ivabradine, and in cases where it is impossible to prescribe antianginal drugs of other classes - as a monotherapy drug.

The most justified situations for the use of CF preductal in the treatment of patients with stable angina:

Insufficient effectiveness of traditional antianginal drugs;

Poor tolerability of traditional antianginal drugs or the presence of contraindications to their use;

Diabetes;

Chronic heart failure.

Diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for myocardial infarction and sudden death in patients with and without coronary artery disease. In diabetes mellitus, metabolism in the muscles and heart shifts towards the utilization of fatty acids, the utilization of glucose is limited, which leads to a decrease in the efficiency of muscle tissue contraction and resistance to ischemia. Limiting the oxidation of fatty acids and stimulating the utilization of glucose when using trimetazidine restores the balance between glycolysis and glucose oxidation, increases the formation of ATP under conditions of limited oxygen consumption in patients with diabetes.

Side effects of timetazidine and contraindications

Rarely - nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions are possible.

The drug is contraindicated during pregnancy due to the lack of clinical data on the safety of its use.

It is unknown whether trimetazidine is excreted in breast milk, so the drug is not recommended during lactation.

SPECIFIC IF CHANNEL INHIBITOR OF SINO-TRIAL COMPOUND (IVABRADINE)

Ivabradine (Coraxan) is a selective and specific inhibitor of If channels of the sinoatrial junction with an anti-ischemic and antianginal effect due to a decrease in heart rate.

An increase in heart rate significantly increases myocardial oxygen demand and increases myocardial blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease. Large epidemiological studies confirm the role of high resting heart rate as a strong predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality in groups of healthy people, in patients with arterial hypertension, patients with metabolic syndrome, the elderly and patients with coronary heart disease. The use of beta-blockers in patients who have suffered a myocardial infarction has revealed the undeniable benefit of lowering heart rate in reducing mortality in this group.

Electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes

Heart rate determines:

Myocardial oxygen consumption and myocardial ischemic threshold;

Diastolic filling time of the coronary arteries and coronary blood flow time;

Increased sympathetic influence of catecholamines, increasing the threshold for ventricular fibrillation, which may lead to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality;

Proatherogenic effect.

High heart rate as a factor of poor physical fitness or poor general health is accompanied by higher rates of coronary, cardiovascular mortality and sudden death is associated with increased mortality in patients with coronary heart disease, confirmed myocardial infarction, in older patients.

In the mechanism of contraction of cardiomyocytes or the generation of impulses by specialized pacemaker cells of the sinus node, the determining factor is the change in potential between the inner and outer surfaces of the cell membrane - transient depolarization of the cell membranes of the action potential.

Under resting conditions, cardiomyocytes are in a state of polarization, having a constant difference in electrical potential between the inner and outer surfaces of the cell membrane - the resting transmembrane potential. The resting transmembrane potential, approximately -90 mV, is maintained, like the action potential, by ionic cytoplasmic currents of the Na-K ion pump through cell membranes and intercellular junctions.

Cell depolarization occurs when positively charged ions enter the cell, continues until the electrochemical gradient is balanced and determines the action potential that moves along the conduction pathways and, at the level of myocardial cells, stimulates muscle contraction.

In the electrophysiological state of cardiomyocytes, phases of fast depolarization, fast repolarization, plateau, slow repolarization related to the action potential, and the resting potential phase are distinguished (Fig. 17.1). In specialized heart cells with pacemaker properties, the slow phase

repolarization enters the phase of spontaneous diastolic (pacemaker) depolarization, which brings the membrane potential to the threshold voltage, resulting in the initiation of an action potential (Fig. 17.2). Spontaneous diastolic depolarization occurs due to the action of the Na-K ion pump, where the flow of positively charged ions into the cell determines the diastolic change in depolarization.

Mechanism of action of Coraxan

Ivabaradine (coraxan)- a representative of a new class of drugs that selectively and specifically inhibits If channels of the sinoatrial junction, the anti-ischemic and antianginal result of which is due to the effect of reducing heart rate.

When the membrane potential is maintained at a level of -35 mV, i.e., with closed If channels, Coraxan does not bind to the cells of the sinus node. The ability to inhibit f channels occurs at a more negative transmembrane potential when the channel is in the open state. In this case, Coraxan is able to reach the binding site located inside the f-channel pore, suppress the If-current and provide an effective reduction in heart rate.

Rice. 17.1. Electrophysiology of cardiomyocytes. 0 - fast depolarization phase, 1 - fast repolarization phase, 2 - plateau phase, 3 - slow repolarization phase, 4 - resting potential phase

Rice. 17.2. Action potential of sinus node cells

The specific binding property of Coraxan to open f-channels has defined the concept of “dependent therapeutic benefit”:

The level of coraxan binding depends on the level of f-channel opening and heart rate;

The effectiveness of Coraxan increases with a higher heart rate.

Coraxan reduces the amplitude of If currents depending on the concentration.

Acting at the level of the sinus node, selectively suppressing ionic If currents of open If channels, Coraxan reduces the rate of spontaneous diastolic depolarization without changing the maximum diastolic potential, increasing the time interval between action potentials and reducing the heart rate depending on the degree of its severity and in proportion to the concentration of the active substances.

At a concentration of Coraxan 100 times higher than the therapeutic one (10 μ/mol), there was a slight decrease in the activity of L-type calcium channels, which did not lead to a significant suppression of the current of calcium ions. These data suggest the absence of a negative inotropic effect of Coraxan on contractions.

tive myocardial function, however, the use of Coraxan in patients with systolic myocardial dysfunction requires additional clinical confirmation.

The effect of Coraxan on T-type calcium channels in the formation of the action potential of the sinus node was not detected.

The effect of Coraxan on the I-potassium current of the repolarization phase of the action potential was noted only when the therapeutic concentration was exceeded by more than 30 times.

Anti-ischemic and hemodynamic effects of Coraxan

The anti-ischemic and anti-anginal effects of Coraxan (5 mg, 7.5 mg or 10 mg 2 times a day) in controlling angina attacks and reducing myocardial ischemia in patients with stable angina are comparable to the anti-anginal and anti-ischemic effects of atenolol and amlodipine (100 mg and 10 mg per day, respectively). Heart rate and double product (HR x BP) at rest and during maximum physical activity as an indicator of myocardial oxygen consumption were significantly lower in the group of patients receiving Coraxan compared to the group receiving amlodipine.

The incidence of adverse side effects was comparable, and Coraxan showed high tolerability.

The antianginal effect of Coraxan is maintained with long-term regular use without the development of pharmacological tolerance. There was no development of withdrawal syndrome after stopping the drug.

The benefits of the drug are especially evident when it is necessary to control the heart rate of patients who have contraindications to the use of beta-adrenergic blockers.

The hemodynamic effect of Coraxan is determined by an increase in the time interval between two action potentials of the sinus node, providing a decrease in heart rate without systemic hemodynamic effects, dose-dependently reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, providing improvement in regional myocardial contractility in the area of ​​reduced coronary blood flow. During therapy with Coraxan, there is no change in mean arterial pressure, no decrease in contractile

ability of the myocardium, the isochoric type of relaxation rate of the left ventricular myocardium is maintained (which is important for maintaining the volume of the left ventricle in heart failure). In the case of left ventricular dysfunction with inadequate tissue perfusion and the need for the use of positive inotropic drugs, these drugs can increase the severity of tachycardia and hypotension (dobutamine) or, by stimulating beta-1 adrenergic receptors, increase the release of norepinephrine (dopamine), which will cause increased myocardial ischemia. In this situation, the use of ivabradine will play an important role in limiting heart rate without reducing the positive inotropic effect, providing improvement in myocardial blood flow while stabilizing the hemodynamics of patients with heart failure or cardiogenic shock. The benefits of ivabradine are also revealed in the treatment of patients with postural orthostatic syndrome, sinus node re-entry tachycardia, excessive sinus tachycardia, when it is not possible to prescribe beta-adrenergic receptor blockers or slow calcium channel blockers - drugs with a negative inotropic and/or hypotensive effect that can enhance symptoms of the disease.

Effect of Coraxan on the QT interval. Prolongation of the QT interval for drugs with negative chronotropic effects is associated with a higher risk of mortality in both patients with heart disease and the general population. Prolongation of the QT interval is a predisposing factor for the occurrence of potentially fatal ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes) due to changes in the process of ventricular repolarization. Data from a study of the effect of ivabradine on the corrected (heart rate-related) QT interval (QTc) confirmed the absence of changes in the QTc interval during therapy with ivabradine.

In patients with stable angina and normal electrophysiological parameters, the use of ivabradine did not reveal a significant slowdown in the conduction of impulses through the atria or ventricles of the heart. These results demonstrate the ability of ivabradine to preserve the atrial refractory period, atrioventricular conduction time, and the duration of the repolarization period.

The combined use of Coraxan with drugs that prolong the QT interval: quinidine, disopyramide, bepredil, sotalol, ibutilide, amiodarone, pimazide, zipraside, sertindole, mefloquine, halofantrine, pentamidine, cisapride, erythromycin.

Concomitant use with drugs that prolong the QT interval may increase the decrease in heart rate, which requires increased cardiac control.

Pharmacokinetic properties of Coraxan

The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. Peak plasma concentrations are reached after 1-1.5 hours, regardless of the dose of the drug. Changes in drug kinetics after meals are not clinically significant. The bioavailability of the drug after oral administration approaches 40%, regardless of the dose of the drug.

The average volume of distribution of the drug in patients is 1.4 l/kg. Plasma protein binding is about 70%.

The average plasma concentration upon reaching steady state is 10 mg/ml. The equilibrium concentration of the drug is achieved within 24 hours.

The drug undergoes active metabolism, 22 metabolites have been identified.

The main metabolism occurs in the liver with the participation of cytochrome CYP3A4; the combined administration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors leads to an increase in the maximum concentration and half-life of the drug, with an increase in the severity of the decrease in heart rate. The use of hepatic metabolism inducers can reduce the area under the pharmacokinetic curve of the drug without affecting electrocardiographic parameters.

The half-life of Coraxan under regular use is about 2 hours. It is excreted in the form of metabolites equally by the liver and kidneys. Less than 10% of an orally administered dose is found unchanged in urine.

Side effects

Visual impairment

The most common side effects when using Coraxan are visual changes in perception (photopsia), moderately pronounced, spontaneously disappearing during therapy.

Photopsia as passing changes in brightness in a limited area of ​​the visual field; they were initiated by a sharp change in illumination intensity, when viewing shiny objects in bright light, and occurred in 14.5% of patients. In only 1% of patients, the appearance of photopsia was the reason for refusing treatment or changing the usual daily routine.

The mechanism of photopsia is inhibition of f-channels in retinal cells.

A common side effect is blurred vision. Side effects from vision may limit the use of the drug in patients driving various types of vehicles or working on production lines.

From the cardiovascular system: frequent - bradycardia, AV block of the first degree, ventricular extrasystole; rare - palpitations, supraventricular extrasystole.

From the gastrointestinal tract: rare - nausea, constipation, diarrhea.

General disorders: common - headache, dizziness, rare - shortness of breath, muscle cramps.

Laboratory changes: rare - hyperuricemia, eosinophilia, increased plasma creatinine levels.

Indications and contraindications

Benefits of Coraxan for concomitant conditions

Stable angina + asthma/COPD

Stable angina + sexual dysfunction

Stable angina + peripheral atherosclerosis

Stable angina + symptoms of weakness

Stable angina + depression

Stable angina + sleep disturbances

Stable angina + no effect of beta blocker

Stable angina + moderate A-V conduction disorders

Stable angina + diabetes with significant fluctuations in glycemia

Stable angina + normal blood pressure Warnings for prescribing Coraxan

Sinus arrhythmia A-V block II degree

Combination with other drugs that reduce heart rate

Arterial hypotension

Acute period of stroke CHF stage II according to NYHA

Moderate liver failure

Severe renal failure

Retinal pigmentary degeneration

Contraindications

Hypersensitivity to ivabradine or any of the excipients of the drug

Resting heart rate less than 60 beats per minute (before treatment)

S-A blockade

A-V blockade III degree

Presence of an artificial pacemaker

Acute myocardial infarction

Cardiogenic shock

Unstable angina

Severe arterial hypotension (BP below 90/50 mmHg)

CHF stage III-IV according to NYHA

Severe liver failure (more than 9 points according to the Child-Pug classification)

Concomitant use with strong inhibitors of cytochrome P 4503A4 (antifungals of the azole group - ketaconazole, intraconazole; macrolides - clarithromycin, erythromycin for oral administration, josamycin, telithromycin; HIV protease inhibitors - nelfinavir, ritonavir; nefozadone)

Pregnancy, breastfeeding.

Coraxan was registered by the European Medicines Registration Agency in July 2005 and by the Russian Pharmacological Committee in November 2005 as a symptomatic treatment of stable angina in patients with sinus rhythm who have a contraindication or intolerance to beta-blockers.

Catad_tema Heart rhythm and conduction disorders - articles

Pulse-sparing pharmacotherapy for sinus rhythm

Published in the magazine, Doctor, No. 11, 2010 V. Oleynikov, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, A. Kulyutsin, Candidate of Medical Sciences, M. Lukyanova,
Medical Institute of Penza State University

Heart rate is an independent risk factor for overall and cardiovascular mortality. The review examines the favorable prognosis-modifying effect of selective deceleration of sinus rhythm using a modern arsenal of pharmacological groups.

Keywords: heart rate, pharmacological correction, β-blockers, calcium antagonists, ivabradine.

Heart rate lowering pharmacotherapy in sinus rhythm
Professor V. Oleinikov, MD; A. Kulyutsin, Candidate of Medical Sciences; M. Lukyanova
Medical Institute, Penza State University

Heart rate is an independent risk factor for overall and cardiovascular mortality. The review considers the favorable prognosis-modifying impact of selective sinus rhythm lowering, by applying the current arsenal of pharmacological groups.

Key words: heart rate, pharmacological correction, β-adrenoblockers, calcium antagonists, ivabradine.

In recent decades, the role of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, in particular in arterial hypertension (AH), coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic heart failure syndrome (CHF), and metabolic syndrome (MS), has been widely discussed. The most accessible manifestation of hypersympathicotonia for physical diagnosis is an increased heart rate (HR). Over the past 20 years, the results of more than 20 epidemiological studies involving more than 280 thousand people have been published, assessing the clinical significance of heart rate in sinus rhythm.

The negative prognosis associated with increased heart rate applies to different categories of patients. Thus, a prospective observation of patients with hypertension showed that each increase in resting heart rate by 10 per minute is associated with an increase in overall and cardiovascular mortality by 20 and 14%, respectively. A number of researchers point to the relationship between resting heart rate and mortality in patients with hypertension, MS and the elderly. C. Pepine et al. The international INVEST study analyzed data from 22,192 patients with hypertension and stable coronary artery disease who were randomized to verapamil SR and atenolol. An increase in baseline resting heart rate was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes (death from all causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction - MI, non-fatal stroke) during 2.7 years of follow-up; in patients with a resting heart rate of more than 100 per minute, the risk was 2 times higher than at a lower heart rate.

Heart rate statistically significantly correlates with the severity and progression of atherosclerosis, which was confirmed by A. Perski et al. when performing coronary angiography in men who have had myocardial infarction at a young age. A recent study found that high heart rate was associated with an increased risk of coronary atherothrombosis. Some studies have shown that an increase in heart rate at rest is associated with increased arterial stiffness, decreased vascular distensibility and high pulse wave propagation speed. Finally, a high heart rate may indicate an imbalance of the autonomic nervous system, being a marker of sympathetic hyperactivity.

It has been established that increased heart rate is accompanied by an increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality not only among patients, but also in the general population. According to the Framingham study, an increase in resting heart rate is associated with an increase in mortality from all causes (coronary, sudden, cerebrovascular) regardless of other risk factors. As a result of analysis of available information, most researchers consider an increase in office heart rate to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and death.

In connection with the above, in 2007, a working group on heart rate was created at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The Working Group Consensus on "Resting Heart Rate in Cardiovascular Disease" has been published. Analysis of the evidence base on the role of heart rate as a risk factor led to the following conclusion: studies in recent years demonstrate a continuous increase in risk with a heart rate exceeding 60 per minute. Also in 2007, the ESC Guideline “Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Clinical Practice” was published, where resting heart rate was for the first time recognized as an independent risk factor for both overall and cardiovascular mortality.

The BEAUTIFUL study, completed in 2008, was the first to analyze the relationship between heart rate and prognosis in a group of patients (5438 examined) who received placebo in addition to standard therapy; analysis showed that heart rate >70 per minute identifies individuals at higher risk of cardiovascular events.

The hypothesis about the role of heart rate as a modifiable risk factor is convincingly confirmed by studies devoted to pharmacological correction of heart rate, which show a direct relationship between a decrease in heart rate and mortality during therapy with β-blockers (BB) in patients who have had a MI or suffer from CHF.

A systematic meta-analysis examining the long-term effects of beta-blocker treatment convincingly demonstrated that a reduction in heart rate of 10.7 beats per minute was associated with a 17.4% reduction in cardiovascular mortality in post-MI patients and an 18% reduction in non-fatal MI. Along with left ventricular wall tension and contractility, heart rate is one of the main factors in myocardial oxygen consumption.

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, an increase in heart rate naturally precedes the occurrence of myocardial ischemia during exercise. The incidence of angina while walking in patients receiving treatment for coronary artery disease depends on the average heart rate: in patients with a sinus rhythm frequency >80 per minute, angina attacks occur 2 times more often than in patients with a heart rate of 60 per minute. The likelihood of developing myocardial ischemia is proportional to the initial level, amplitude and duration of the increase in heart rate.

Data from clinical studies indicate that in chronic ischemic heart disease, a decrease in heart rate not only provides better control of symptoms, but also improves survival in this category of patients.

The effect of reducing heart rate in hypertension is not so clear. Thus, in a systematic review and meta-analysis performed at Columbia University (USA), it was shown that (in contrast to patients with MI and CHF), a decrease in heart rate with the help of a beta-blocker in patients with hypertension is accompanied by an increase in the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and overall mortality . As a possible explanation, a disruption in synchronization between the outgoing and reflected pulse waves is considered, with the latter returning to systole (instead of diastole), thereby increasing central aortic pressure and left ventricular afterload.

Information about the importance of heart rate in clinical practice is reflected in the principles of sinus rhythm frequency control and target limits for reducing office heart rate in certain diseases and CHF syndrome, presented in European and national recommendations. Oddly enough, other currently available clinically adapted instrumental methods for monitoring pulse-lowering therapy have not yet been considered at all.

Target limits for heart rate reduction
Effective doses of pulse-lowering pharmacological agents, even with the same mechanism of action, can vary significantly in different patients, therefore in clinical practice it is necessary to use not fixed doses of drugs, but those that cause a distinct effect of reducing heart rate. R. Gorlin wrote back in 1976 that in order to reduce the rhythm frequency, “... it is necessary in all cases to look for an effective dose of β-blockers, and the real way for this is to monitor the degree of reduction in heart rate at rest.”

Historically, the greatest development in research and clinical practice has been the determination of heart rate in conditions of physical and emotional rest - the so-called office heart rate. This is explained by the simplicity of studying this indicator and its fairly high prognostic significance. The first attempt to systematize epidemiological data on the effect of resting heart rate on life expectancy was made in 1945. At that time, a heart rate of 99 per minute was considered the starting point above which the risk of cardiovascular complications arose. The evolution of attitudes towards the heart rate threshold in studies devoted to this issue is visible from the data presented in the table.

The value of the threshold heart rate value in studies of different years

Study Year Critical heart rate level, per minute Source
US Army officers 1945 99 Levy R. // JAMA. - 1945; 129:585-588
Israeli government employees 1973 90 Medalie J. // J. Chronic Dis. - 1973; 26: 329-349
Chicago Western Electric 1980 89 Dyer A.//Am. J. Epidemiol- 1980; 112:736-749
Framingham 1985 87 Kannel W.//Am. Heart J. - 1985; 109:876-885
NHANES 1991 84 Gillum R.//Am. Heart. J. - 1991; 121: 172-177
CASTEL 1999 80 Palatini P. // Arch. Intern. Med. - 1999; 159:585-592
Post-MI 2005 75 Mausse O. // J. Electrocardiol. - 2005; 38: 106-112
Post-CABG 2006 70 Mehta R.//Am. Heart. J. - 2006; 152:80126
Vascular surgeri 2006 65 Don Poldermans // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006; 48:964-969

There is an obvious trend towards a decrease in the conditional critical level, which gradually led to the office value of 65 per minute.

Despite the large arsenal of methods for both discrete and permanent assessment of the chronotropic function of the heart, primarily Holter ECG monitoring, until now there have been no controlled studies verifying target heart rate levels using more informative indicators than office ones. At the same time, the use of accessible equipment that allows you to quickly process any arrays of frequency indicators of heart rate could fundamentally change our ideas about the acceptable limits of heart rate reduction in various diseases. So, according to H. Copie et al. , Heart rate assessed during 24-hour ECG monitoring has an even higher prognostic value than the determination of left ventricular ejection fraction, which is usually used as a prognostic index. The lack of epidemiological data on threshold heart rate values ​​determined by methods other than resting counting makes it urgent to search for new approaches to in-depth frequency analysis of sinus rhythm.

Pharmacological agents for pulse-lowering heart rate correction
There are 3 most common groups of drugs that modulate the frequency of sinus rhythm due to their effect on the function of the sinoatrial node: BB, calcium antagonists (CA), mainly of the non-dihydropyridine series, and F-channel inhibitors of the sinus node.

There are other classes of drugs that affect heart rate indirectly - through the vasomotor center or sympathovagal interactions. These include centrally acting drugs, cardiac glycosides, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and psychotropic modulators. However, their effect on heart rate is nonspecific, often does not reach clinical significance and is difficult to control, so the use of these classes of drugs to correct heart rate in practical work is irrational.

β-blockers.
Since heart rate is a clinical marker of sympathetic activity, it is most logical to correct heart rate using drugs that can prevent activation of the SNS or eliminate the pathophysiological effects of hypersympathicotonia that has already occurred. The latter mechanism underlies the pharmacological effects of BB, introduced into clinical practice more than 40 years ago. Initially they were used as antiarrhythmic drugs and for the treatment of angina pectoris; subsequently, the range of indications was significantly expanded. Currently, BBs are used to treat stable angina of all functional classes, the effectiveness of these drugs in acute forms of coronary artery disease has been proven, they are used in the treatment of hypertension, supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, to control heart rate in patients with atrial fibrillation, they increase the life expectancy of patients with CHF.

Without going into the nuances of the mechanism of action, we note that the basis for the positive clinical effect of all BBs is their ability to weaken the physiological and pathophysiological effects of norepinephrine and adrenaline, which are mediated by α- and β-adrenergic receptors.

Studies of the level of norepinephrine in the blood using high experimental technologies (microneurography, spectral analysis) made it possible to establish that BB eliminates many of the toxic effects characteristic of catecholamines:

  • oversaturation of the cytosol with calcium;
  • direct necrotizing effect on cardiomyocytes;
  • stimulating effect on cell growth and apoptosis of cardiomyocytes;
  • progression of myocardial fibrosis and left ventricular myocardial hypertrophy;
  • increased automatism of myocytes and fibrillatory action;
  • hypokalemia;
  • proarrhythmic effect;
  • increased oxygen consumption by the myocardium;
  • hyperreninemia;
  • tachycardia.

    There is no generally accepted classification of BB. Drugs used for long-term therapy of cardiovascular diseases can be conveniently divided into the following groups depending on the presence or absence of vasodilating properties and β 1-adrenoselectivity:

  • BB without vasodilating properties: non-selective (propranolol, nadolol, oxprenolol, sotalol, timolol, etc.); β 1 -selective (atenolol, betaxolol, bisoprolol, metoprolol, etc.);
  • BB with vasodilating properties: non-selective (bucindolol, carvedilol, labetolol, pindolol, etc.); β 1-selective (nebivolol, celiprolol, etc.).

    Currently, BBs occupy a leading position among pulse-lowering drugs due to the many important clinical effects confirmed from the standpoint of evidence-based medicine in patients with various cardiovascular pathologies, the development of which is based on pathological hyperactivity of the sympathetic part of the autonomic nervous system. It is in relation to this class of drugs that the target resting heart rate levels for the treatment of individual nosological forms are most fully defined. It is considered proven that the beneficial effect of BBs on the prognosis is possible only if they cause a clear blockade of β-adrenergic receptors. The presence of the latter in the clinic can be judged by the degree of decrease in heart rate. It has been shown that when treating BD, the optimal heart rate is 55-60 per minute. The American Heart Association guidelines for the treatment of stable angina pectoris note that in patients with severe angina pectoris, using a beta-blocker can achieve heart rate and<50 в минуту при условии, что "такая брадикардия не вызывает неприятных ощущений и что при этом не развивается блокада" . Менее конкретны рекомендации по применению ББ при ХСН: "...снижение ЧСС является отражением успешного применения ББ у больных с ХСН. Уменьшение ЧСС минимум на 15% от исходной величины характеризует правильное лечение ББ больных с ХСН" .

    Meanwhile, in practical healthcare it is not always possible to achieve adequate heart rate control when using BB. The actually prescribed doses often do not correspond to the recommended ones, which is associated with the fear of developing side effects, although they are rare when using highly selective BBs. In addition, BBs have a number of relative and absolute contraindications that limit their use.

    Calcium antagonists.
    In a broad sense, AKs are substances that eliminate the effect of ionized calcium on smooth muscle, affecting the movement of these ions through the cell membrane, or their binding/release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. AKs do not have an antagonistic effect on calcium ions, so the term “slow calcium channel blockers” is used to refer to them.

    There are 5 main types of slow calcium channels. The point of application of AKs used in cardiology are slow L-type calcium channels, localized mainly in the sinoatrial node, atrioventricular tracts, Purkinje fibers, and vascular smooth muscle cells.

    AKs differ in chemical structure, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological properties, as a result of which they are divided into 3 subgroups: phenylalkylamines (verapamil subgroup), benzodiazepines (diltiazem subgroup) and dihydropyridines (nifedipine subgroup).

    Clinical and experimental studies have shown certain differences in the effect of different AAs on the tone of the SNS. In particular, long-term use of dihydropyridine AA led to activation of the SNS, which is explained by hypotension and a reflex increase in heart rate.

    Phenylalkylamines and benzodiazepines have a significantly less pronounced peripheral vasodilating effect. Their effects are dominated by a negative effect on the automatism of the sinus node, a slowdown of atrioventricular conduction, and a negative inotropic effect due to the effect on myocardial contractility. These properties bring verapamil and diltiazem closer to BB. They can be used to selectively influence heart rate in patients without heart failure or a pronounced decrease in myocardial contractility in cases where BBs are contraindicated, not tolerated or are not effective enough.

    A T-type calcium channel blocker, zatebradine, was tested as a drug potentially capable of regulating sinus rhythm in isolation. However, in-depth studies have shown that in doses necessary to reduce heart rate, the drug increases the duration of the QT interval on the ECG, which, as is known, can provoke the development of ventricular tachycardia such as torsades de pointes.

    Non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists reduce heart rate to a lesser extent (about 2 times) than BBs. At the maximum dose, diltiazem reduces sinus rhythm by 6.9 per minute, and verapamil by 7.2, while when taking atenolol or metoprolol, heart rate decreases by 15 per minute. In the randomized clinical double-blind study VAMPHYRE, the effectiveness and effect of Isoptin SR 240 mg and amlodipine in patients with hypertension on sympathetic activity were compared. The antihypertensive effect of the drugs was similar, but verapamil SR, unlike amlodipine, significantly reduced the activity of the SNS.

    We did not find studies defining target heart rate levels for the treatment of AK in patients with cardiovascular pathology. Whether it is possible to extrapolate the principles of BB dosing to non-dihydropyridine AKs will be shown by specially designed clinical trials. Taking into account the evidence base, it can be argued that ACs cannot fully replace BB in patients with increased heart rate due to CHF. At the same time, in the treatment of hypertensive patients with high SNS tone, elements of MS, pulse-lowering ACs are becoming increasingly serious competitors of BBs due to the ability to effectively control blood pressure levels and metabolic neutrality. Thus, in a secondary analysis of the ASCOT-BPLA study, no evidence was found that in patients with uncomplicated hypertension and high heart rate, antihypertensive therapy based on the BB atenolol was more effective than therapy based on the AC amlodipine. Possible dyssynchrony of outgoing and reflected pulse waves, which occurs when controlling the heart rate of the BB and is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and overall mortality among patients with hypertension, is a compelling reason for the use in clinical practice of drugs that combine a slowdown of the rhythm with a decrease in the tone of resistive vessels, which is typical for the subgroup of non-dihydropyridine slow calcium channel blockers.

    Inhibitors of F-channels of the sinus node.
    The classes of drugs listed above, along with the ability to influence the chronotropic function of the sinus node, have many both beneficial and adverse effects arising from the heart, blood vessels, and other body systems. It is the lack of high selectivity of pharmacological agents in influencing the sinus node that explains the use of suboptimal dosages of rhythm-slowing drugs and, as a consequence, such a rare achievement of adequate heart rate control in clinical practice.

    This state of affairs has determined the interest of pharmacologists in the search for new drugs with a specific effect that can selectively reduce heart rate. Among the ionic currents involved in the formation of the action potential and the regulation of spontaneous diastolic depolarization of the sinus node, the pacemaker current I f is the most important. It is mixed and consists of a current of sodium ions directed into the cell and (to a lesser extent) an outward current of potassium ions. The flow of positively charged ions into the cell determines the diastolic change in depolarization.

    Ivabradine is the product of scientific research and long-term research to create a selective drug aimed exclusively at reducing heart rate. About 10 years passed from the discovery of F channels and ionic I f current in specialized cells of the sinus node to the synthesis of the ivabradine molecule, which specifically inhibits I f current. The completion of preclinical and controlled clinical studies confirming the effectiveness and safety of ivabradine allowed the European Medicines Agency in 2005 to approve the instructions for ivabradine (Coraxan, Servier Laboratories, France) as the first I f -current inhibitor approved for use.

    According to the mechanism of action, it is a specific inhibitor of ion currents I f, reducing the rate of slow spontaneous diastolic depolarization. A feature of the pharmacodynamics of ivabradine is its inhibitory activity only towards open F channels. Analysis of the specific properties of drug binding to F channels led to the concept of “dependent therapeutic benefit”, according to which the more often the channels open, the higher the level of ivabradine binding. Thus, the effectiveness of ivabradine increases with increasing heart rate, i.e. precisely when its reduction is especially necessary.

    In comparison with BB and AK, ivabradine can be called a representative of a fundamentally new class of drugs; The existing evidence base allows us to assess the value of this drug in clinical practice. Ivabradine was studied as a drug for monotherapy and compared with placebo, BB and AC, which made it possible to expand the understanding of its merits, safety and benefit/risk ratio. Improvement in the patient's tolerance to exercise during bicycle ergometry or other testing is considered to be the standard evidence of the antianginal effectiveness of ivabradine. In this case, the reduction or disappearance of exercise-induced anginal attacks should be verified by a decrease or disappearance of ischemia, which would confirm the absence of “masking” of angina by the analgesic effect of the test drug.

    The first large, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate “pure” heart rate deceleration was performed in accordance with the given control principles; It involved 360 patients with coronary artery disease from various cardiological centers in Europe, with documented stenotic lesions of the coronary arteries and stress test-induced ST segment depression. Ivabradine at a dose of 20 mg/day significantly (compared to placebo) increased the time to the onset of angina and the time to the onset of ST segment depression. The resting heart rate was 15 per minute less than in the placebo group. Despite the significant decrease in heart rate, ivabradine caused a very small decrease in blood pressure.

    In the double-blind 4-month INITIATIVE study, 939 patients were assigned to receive ivabradine (10-20 mg/day) and atenolol (50-100 mg/day). When comparing antianginal and anti-ischemic effectiveness in groups, no significant differences were obtained, which proves the clinical effectiveness of ivabradine. It has also been shown that the use of ivabradine in patients with proven coronary artery disease allows this drug to be considered one of the safest antianginal drugs with a minimum number of side effects.

    In a large randomized, double-blind study (1195 patients with stable angina) testing ivabradine and amlodipine, the total duration of exercise and the time to the onset of an angina attack were also not statistically different.

    In 2008, the results of the BEAUTIFUL study were published, which included almost 11 thousand patients from 33 countries. The study demonstrated that in patients with stable coronary artery disease with left ventricular dysfunction with a heart rate >70 per minute, taking ivabradine reduced the risk of all coronary events by 22%, the risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction by 36%, and the need for revascularization by 30%. The study is the first to demonstrate the beneficial effect of selective heart rate deceleration for coronary events on prognosis, even in patients already receiving current optimal treatment.

    A targeted study of the clinical effects of ivabradine in patients with CHF (SHIFT study), as well as in patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular systolic function (SIGNIFY study), is currently ongoing.

    Thus, there are obvious good prospects for the use of a selective I f -inhibitor in a wide range of patients with multimorbid pathology that precludes treatment with other pulse-sparing drugs, as well as in common cases when traditional basic therapy does not provide effective control of heart rate. Of exceptional scientific interest is the use of ivabradine (Coraxan) as a tool for further studying the clinical significance of heart rate as a risk factor for the progression of cardiovascular pathology and the role of heart rate as a general biological determinant of life expectancy.

    It is noteworthy to evaluate the possibility of using ivabradine in patients with increased heart rate without organic pathology of the heart and blood vessels, as well as in arrhythmology with idiopathic sinus tachycardia.

    More and more data, based on evidence-based medicine, are accumulating on the independent significance of heart rate as a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Therefore, along with improving the means of pharmacological and non-drug correction of this indicator, new diagnostic approaches to quantitative assessment of the rhythm frequency will be required, not limited to the archaic counting of the pulse at rest. Their potential lies in the ability to extract clinically important information about heart rhythm in the face of changing regulatory influences. This information will allow us to differentiate therapeutic tactics for heart rate control in different forms of cardiovascular pathology.

  • Clinical pharmacology

    A new class of cardiovascular drugs: a selective sinus node β-channel inhibitor

    In 2005, the European Medicines Registration Agency and the Pharmacological Committee of the Russian Federation registered Coraxan (active ingredient - ivabradine) - the first β-inhibitor of the selective and specific action of the channels of the sinoatrial connection. Coraxan was registered as a remedy for the symptomatic treatment of stable angina in patients with sinus rhythm who have contraindications to the use of β-blockers or are intolerant to them. Ivabradine has anti-ischemic and antianginal effects due to a decrease in heart rate (HR).

    An increase in heart rate significantly increases the myocardial oxygen demand and increases coronary blood flow in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Large epidemiological studies confirm the role of high resting heart rate as an important predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, as well as in healthy people. The use of β-blockers in patients who have suffered myocardial infarction (MI) has confirmed that a decrease in heart rate leads to a decrease in mortality.

    The BEAUTIFUL study showed that in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, heart rate >70 beats/min is an independent unfavorable factor that significantly worsens the prognosis. Cardiovascular risk

    General Medicine 4.2008-

    ON THE. Egorova

    Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Russian State Medical University

    The overall mortality rate in these patients increases by 34%, the risk of fatal and non-fatal MI by 46%, and the need for revascularization by 38%, even with optimal therapy. Adding Coraxan to treatment in patients with coronary artery disease and heart rate >70 beats/min can improve the prognosis, reducing the risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, as well as the need for revascularization. At the same time, Coraxan can be safely combined with any drugs for the treatment of coronary artery disease, including calcium antagonists and P-blockers.

    Electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes

    High heart rate as a factor of low physical fitness or poor general health is accompanied by a higher level of coronary, cardiovascular and sudden death, and is associated with increased mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and the elderly.

    Heart rate determines:

    Myocardial oxygen consumption and myocardial ischemic threshold;

    Diastolic filling time of the coronary arteries (and, accordingly, coronary blood flow time);

    Increased influence of catecholamines (a determining factor in reducing heart rate variability - a marker of life-threatening arrhythmias);

    Atherogenic effect associated with an increase in blood levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;

    Hemodynamic stress in the form of tachycardia (the “shear stress” factor) leads to the development of atherosclerosis of the coronary, iliac and renal arteries due to changes in the release of growth factors by the endothelium;

    Reduced distensibility of the carotid arteries as one of the signs of atherosclerotic lesions.

    The generation of impulses by specialized pacemaker cells of the sinus node occurs as a result of a change in the potential difference between the inner and outer surfaces of the cell membrane - transient depolarization of cell membranes (phase I of the action potential).

    At rest, cardiomyocytes have a constant electrical potential difference between the inner and outer surfaces of the cell membrane—the resting transmembrane potential—of approximately -90 mV. This potential is maintained by transmembrane ionic currents with the participation of the Na+-K+ pump. Cell depolarization occurs when positive ions enter the cell, continues until the electrochemical gradient is balanced and determines an action potential, which then moves along the conduction pathways and stimulates the contraction of cardiomyocytes.

    In the electrophysiology of cardiomyocytes, phases of fast depolarization, fast repolarization, plateau and slow repolarization phases related to the action potential are distinguished, as well as the resting potential phase. In specialized pacemaker cells of the heart, the phase of slow repolarization passes into the phase of spontaneous diastolic (pacemaker) depolarization, which brings the membrane potential to a threshold value, at which

    rum an action potential is triggered. Spontaneous diastolic depolarization occurs due to the action of the Na+-K+ ion pump, which ensures the flow of positive ions into the cell.

    Mechanism of action of Coraxan

    Ivabradine (Coraxan) is the first selective 1g-inhibitor that has a pulse-lowering effect and does not have a negative inotropic effect, and also does not affect atrioventricular conduction and blood pressure (BP). The anti-ischemic and anti-anginal effect of ivabradine is due to a decrease in heart rate due to inhibition of 1g-ion currents in the sinoatrial junction.

    Inhibition of 1g-ion currents plays a key role in heart rate control. Catecholamines, by stimulating the activity of adenylate cyclase, increase the production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which promotes the opening of G channels, while the suppression of cAMP production by acetylcholine inhibits their opening. Coraxan specifically binds to the G-channels of the sinus node and thus reduces heart rate.

    When the membrane potential is maintained at a level of -35 mV (i.e., with G-channels closed), Coraxan does not bind to the cells of the sinus node. The ability to inhibit G channels occurs at a lower transmembrane potential when the channel is in the open state. Then Coraxan is able to reach the binding site located inside the G-channel pore, suppress the Ig current and provide an effective reduction in heart rate.

    Such features of the binding of Korak-san with G-channels determined the concept of “dependent therapeutic utility”: the level of Korak-san binding depends on

    Educational case 4.2008

    Clinical pharmacology

    the level of opening of G-channels and heart rate, and the effectiveness of Coraxan increases with a higher heart rate. In practice, this means that in patients with an initially higher heart rate, its decrease will be more pronounced and will bring it as close as possible to the target level<60 уд./мин. В то же время у пациентов с исходно не очень высоким уровнем ЧСС эта особенность Кораксана обеспечивает высокую безопасность в плане возникновения брадикардии.

    By selectively suppressing ionic Ig currents at the level of the sinus node, Coraxan reduces the rate of spontaneous diastolic depolarization without changing the maximum diastolic potential. As a result, the time interval between action potentials increases and heart rate decreases, depending on the severity of tachycardia and in proportion to the concentration of the active substance.

    At a concentration of Coraxan 100 times higher than the therapeutic one, there was a slight decrease in the activity of L-type calcium channels, which did not lead to a significant suppression of the current of calcium ions. These data suggest the absence of a negative effect of Coraxan on myocardial contractile function, however, additional clinical evidence is required for the use of Coraxan in patients with systolic myocardial dysfunction.

    No effect of Coraxan on T-type calcium channels in the formation of the action potential of the sinus node was detected. The effect of Coraxan on the 1-potassium current of the repolarization phase of the action potential was noted only when the therapeutic concentration was exceeded by more than 30 times.

    Pharmacokinetics of ivabradine

    Ivabradine is rapidly absorbed after oral administration. Peak plasma concentration is reached after 1-1.5 hours, not

    8 General Medicine 4.2008

    depending on the dose of the drug. The bioavailability of the drug after oral administration approaches 40% and does not depend on the dose or food intake.

    The mean volume of distribution of ivabradine is 1.4 L/kg. The average concentration in plasma upon reaching equilibrium is 10 mg/ml, binding to plasma proteins is about 70%. The equilibrium concentration of the drug is achieved within 24 hours.

    Ivabradine undergoes active metabolism in the liver with the participation of cytochrome CYP3A4. Concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors leads to an increase in the maximum concentration and half-life of the drug, increasing the degree of reduction in heart rate. The use of hepatic metabolism inducers can reduce the area under the pharmacokinetic curve of ivabradine without affecting ECG parameters.

    The half-life of ivabradine with regular use is about 2 hours. The drug is excreted in the form of metabolites equally by the liver and kidneys, less than 10% of the dose taken is found unchanged in the urine.

    Hemodynamic properties of Coraxan

    The hemodynamic properties of Coraxan are determined by an increase in the time interval between two action potentials of the sinus node. This ensures a decrease in heart rate without systemic hemodynamic effects, a dose-dependent reduction in myocardial oxygen consumption, and an improvement in regional myocardial contractility in the area of ​​reduced coronary blood flow.

    During Coraxan therapy, there is no change in mean blood pressure and no decrease in myocardial contractility; more favorable dynamics of LV myocardial relaxation are maintained (which is important for

    Selective I-sinus node channel inhibitor

    LV volume storage in heart failure).

    With LV dysfunction under the influence of inotropic drugs, the release of norepinephrine may increase, tachycardia and hypotension may increase, which will cause increased myocardial ischemia. In such a situation, the use of Coraxan will have an important role in limiting heart rate without reducing the positive inotropic effect. This will improve myocardial blood flow and stabilize hemodynamics in patients with heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

    The benefits of ivabradine are also revealed in the treatment of patients with postural orthostatic hypotension syndrome, sinus node tachycardia by the “re-entry” mechanism, persistent sinus tachycardia, when it is impossible to prescribe P-blockers or slow calcium channel blockers (drugs with negative inotropic and/or hypotensive effects that may increase the symptoms of the disease).

    Effect of ivabradine on the QT interval

    Prolongation of the corrected (heart rate-related) QT interval (QT^ under the influence of drugs with a negative chronotropic effect is associated with a higher risk of death both in patients with heart disease and in the general population. QT^ prolongation is a factor due to changes in the repolarization process ventricular tachycardia predisposes to the occurrence of potentially fatal ventricular tachycardia of the torsade de pointes type. A clinical study of ivabradine confirmed the absence of changes in the QQ interval during therapy.

    In patients with stable angina and normal electrophysiological parameters, Coraxan did not cause a significant slowdown in the conduction of impulses through the atria or ventricles of the heart. This

    speaks of the ability of ivabradine to maintain atrial refractory periods, atrioventricular conduction time and the duration of the repolarization period.

    It is not recommended to use Coraxan simultaneously with drugs that prolong the QT interval (quinidine, disopyramide, bepredil, sotalol, ibutilide, amiodarone, pentamidine, cisapride, erythromycin, etc.). The combined use of Coraxan with similar drugs may increase the decrease in heart rate, which requires more careful monitoring of the patient's condition. At the same time, according to the BEAUTIFUL study, the combined use of Coraxan with P-blockers and calcium antagonists is safe and does not require additional monitoring.

    Antianginal and anti-ischemic effects

    The antianginal and anti-ischemic effects of Coraxan (at a dose of 7.5 or 10 mg 2 times a day) in patients with stable angina pectoris are comparable to the similar effects of atenolol (100 mg/day) and amlodipine (10 mg/day).

    Heart rate and the value of the double product (heart rate x blood pressure) at rest and during maximum physical activity as an indicator of myocardial oxygen consumption were significantly lower in the group of patients receiving Coraxan compared to amlodipine. The frequency of adverse effects (AE) was comparable, and Coraxan was shown to be well tolerated.

    The antianginal effect of Coraxan is maintained with long-term regular use without the development of pharmacological tolerance. No withdrawal syndrome was detected after stopping the drug.

    Undesirable effects

    The most common adverse events associated with the use of Coraxan were visual impairment

    General Medicine 4.2008

    Clinical pharmacology

    perceptions (photopsia), moderately expressed and spontaneously disappearing during therapy. Photopsia (transient changes in brightness in a limited area of ​​the visual field) were initiated by a sharp change in illumination intensity when viewing shiny objects in bright light and occurred in 14.5% of patients. In only 1% of patients, the appearance of photopsia was the reason for refusing treatment or changing the usual daily routine. The mechanism of photopsia is inhibition of G-channels in retinal cells. A common NE is blurred vision. AEs from the visual side may limit the use of the drug in patients driving various vehicles or working on assembly lines.

    From the cardiovascular system, common adverse events were bradycardia, atrioventricular block of the first degree, and ventricular extrasystole; rare - palpitations, supraventricular extrasystole. Rare gastrointestinal adverse events were nausea, constipation, or diarrhea. Among common NEs, headache and dizziness were often observed, and rarely, shortness of breath and muscle cramps. Rare laboratory changes include hyperuricemia, blood eosinophilia, and increased plasma creatinine levels.

    Indications and contraindications

    The advantages of Coraxan over P-blockers are possible for stable angina in combination with the following conditions:

    Bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;

    Erectile disfunction;

    Atherosclerosis of peripheral arteries;

    Symptoms of weakness;

    Depression;

    Sleep disorders;

    Lack of effect from P-blockers;

    General Medicine 4.2008

    Moderate disturbances of atrioventricular conduction;

    Diabetes mellitus with significant fluctuations in glycemia;

    Normal blood pressure.

    Caution must be exercised when prescribing Coraxan in the following cases:

    Second degree atrioventricular block;

    Concomitant use of other drugs that reduce heart rate;

    Arterial hypotension;

    Acute period of stroke;

    Moderate liver failure;

    Severe renal failure;

    Retinal pigmentary degeneration.

    Contraindications to the use of Korak-san:

    Hypersensitivity to ivabradine or any of the auxiliary components of the drug;

    Heart rate at rest<60 уд./мин (до начала лечения);

    Sick sinus syndrome;

    Sinoauricular block;

    Third degree atrioventricular block;

    Presence of an artificial pacemaker;

    Acute myocardial infarction;

    Cardiogenic shock;

    Unstable angina;

    Severe arterial hypotension (BP<90/50 мм рт. ст.);

    Chronic heart failure stage III-IV according to the NYHA classification;

    Severe liver failure (more than 9 points according to the Chail-da-Pue classification);

    Simultaneous use of strong inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4 (antifungals of the azole group - ketoconazole, itraconazole; macrolides - clarithromycin, erythromycin for oral administration,

    Clinical pharmacology

    josamycin, telithromycin; HIV protease inhibitors - nelfinavir, ritonavir; nefazadone); pregnancy, breastfeeding.

    BEAUTIFUL Study Data

    In January 2005, an international multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease and LV systolic dysfunction was launched. The BEAUTIFUL study assessed the effectiveness of ivabradine compared with placebo on cardiovascular events in patients with stable CAD and LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction<39%). Это первое исследование, изучавшее влияние изолированного снижения ЧСС иваб-радином на прогноз у пациентов с ИБС и дисфункцией ЛЖ. Первичная комбинированная конечная точка исследования - время до возникновения первого из следующих событий: смерть вследствие сердечно-сосудистых причин, госпитализация по поводу острого ИМ, госпитализация по поводу манифестации или прогрессирования сердечной недостаточности.

    Across 660 study sites, 10,947 people (aged >55 years without diabetes and >18 years with diabetes) were randomized to placebo or ivabradine (5 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 7.5 mg twice daily). per day). In both groups, patients received therapy with antiplatelet agents (94%), statins (74%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (90%), and P-blockers (87%). Among the P-blockers, carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol were most often used; the doses of P-blockers on average were about 50% of the maximum. The observation period lasted from 18 to 36 months.

    The results of the BEAUTIFUL study were presented at the European

    General Medicine 4.2008-

    Congress of Cardiologists in September 2008. Prescribing Coraxan to patients with ischemic heart disease, LV dysfunction and heart rate >70 beats/min improved the prognosis in these patients. Although there was no difference in the primary endpoint, the study results showed an improvement in prognosis for coronary events. Coraxan reduced the risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction by 35%, the need for revascularization by 30%, and the frequency of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction or unstable angina by 22%.

    It is important to note that these results were obtained in patients who initially already received optimal therapy from a modern point of view, including statins, antiplatelet agents, P-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. These results prove not only the prognostic significance of increased heart rate, but also the importance of effective control of this indicator. Selective reduction of heart rate with Coraxan can significantly improve the prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease with heart rate >70 beats/min. Coraxan is safe to use simultaneously with pulse-lowering drugs, including P-blockers and calcium antagonists.

    Erofeeva S.B., Maneshina O.A., Belousov Yu.B. The place of ivabradine, the first If inhibitor with selective and specific action, in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases // Qualitative clinical practice. 2006. No. 1. P. 10-22. Cook S., Togni M., Schaub M.C. et al. High heart rate: cardiovascular rick factor? //Eur. Heart J. 2006. No. 27. P. 2387-2393. DiFrancesco D. If current inhibitors: properties of drug-channel interaction // Selective and Specific if Channel Inhibitor in Cardiology / Ed. by Fox K. L.: Science Press Ltd., 2004. P. 1-13.

    Fox K., Ferrari R., Tendera M. et al. Rationale and design of a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ivabradine in patient with sta-

    Selective I-sinus node channel inhibitor

    ble coronary artery disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: the morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the If inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL) study // Amer. Heart J. 2006. P. 860-866.

    Fox K., Ford I., Steg P.G. et al. Ivabradine for patients with stable coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial // Lancet. 2008. V. 372. P. 807-816.

    Kannel W.B., Kannel C., Paffenbarger R.S. Jr., Cupples L.A. Heart rate and cardiovascular mortality: the Framingham Study // Amer. Heart J. 1987. V. 113. P. 1489-1494.

    McGovern P.G., Pankow J.S., Shahar E. et al. Recent trends in acute coronary heart disease - mortality, morbidity, medical care, and risk factors. The Minnesota Heart Survey Investigators // N. Engl. J. Med. 1996. V. 334. P. 884-890.

    Ruzillo W., Tendera M., Ford I. et al. Antianginal efficacy and safety of ivabradine compared with amlodipine in patient with stable effort angina pectoris: a 3-month randomized double-blind, multicetre noninferiority trial // Drugs. 2007. V. 67. No. 3. P. 393-405.

    Tardif J.C., Ford I., Tendera M. et al. Efficacy of ivabradine, a new selective If inhibitor compared with atenolol in patients with chronic stable angina // Eur. Heart J. 2005. V. 26. P. 2529-2536.

    Books from the Atmosphere Publishing House

    Clinical researches. 2nd ed., rev. and additional (author O.G. Melikhov)

    The monograph presents the main theoretical and practical aspects of clinical research quite fully and at the same time popularly. A clinical trial is a study of the safety and effectiveness of an investigational drug in humans to identify or confirm its clinical, pharmacological, pharmacodynamic properties, side effects and other features of its action on the body. The task of all specialists involved in this process is to minimize the risk to which patients participating in studies are exposed and to obtain impeccable scientific data on the properties of the new drug. The history, phases and types of clinical trials, issues of planning, conduct and quality control are considered. Particular attention is paid to ethical issues.

    The second edition (the first edition was published in 2003) is supplemented with information about regulatory documents of the Russian Federation and international organizations published in the period from 2004 to 2007. 200 p.

    For clinical research professionals, clinical researchers, and anyone interested in the drug development process.

    Sinus node dysfunction (sick sinus syndrome)

    The sinus node (SN) normally automatically produces electrical impulses at an “intrinsic frequency.” The method for determining it and the calculation formula are described in the section “Special examination of patients with cardiac arrhythmias.” The autonomic nervous system modulates this frequency so that parasympathetic influences (acetylcholine) decrease it and sympathetic influences (norepinephrine) increase it. The balance of these influences constantly changes depending on the time of day, body position, level of physical and emotional stress, ambient temperature, factors triggering reflex reactions, etc. Therefore, the frequency of sinus rhythm varies widely throughout the day, decreasing at rest, especially during sleep, and increasing during the daytime while awake. In this case, along with normosystole, both sinus tachycardia (heart rate more than 100 imp/min) and sinus bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 imp/min) can be observed. To characterize these conditions from the point of view of normality and pathology (sinus node dysfunction), it is important not only to determine the acceptable limits of bradycardia severity, but also to assess the adequacy of the increase in sinus rhythm frequency in response to imposed loads.
    Physiological sinus bradycardia can be observed during the daytime at rest and at night as the predominant heart rhythm. It is believed that the maximum decrease in rhythm frequency during the day at rest is determined by the value of 40 imp/min, at night - 35 imp/min and does not depend on gender and age. The development of sinus pauses is also allowed, the duration of which is up to 2000 ms and is not a rare occurrence in healthy individuals. But their duration cannot normally exceed 3000 ms. Often in highly qualified athletes, as well as in people with heavy physical labor, in young men, bradycardia is recorded with a frequency lower than indicated, possibly in combination with other manifestations of sinus node dysfunction. These conditions can be classified as normal only in cases where they are asymptomatic and there is an adequate increase in sinus rhythm in response to physical activity.
    Assessing the adequacy of the increase in sinus rhythm frequency in response to exercise often causes difficulties in clinical practice. This is due to the lack of universal methodological approaches to determining chronotropic incompetence and agreed upon criteria for its diagnosis. The most widespread is the so-called chronotropic index, which is calculated based on the results of a test with physical activity according to the protocol of maximum tolerability of symptom-limited physical activity. The chronotropic index is the ratio (%) of the difference between peak heart rate at maximum exercise and resting heart rate (chronotropic response) to the difference between age-predicted maximum heart rate, calculated by the formula (220 - age)(imppm) and resting heart rate (chronotropic reserve ). It is believed that the normal value of the chronotropic index is ≥80%. Refined formulas are also offered, adapted to gender, the presence of cardiovascular diseases (CHD) and the use of beta-blockers, but the debate about the advisability of their clinical use continues.
    The normal function of the sinus node is carried out due to the spontaneous depolarization of its pacemaker N-cells (automatism) and the conduction of emerging impulses by transient T-cells to the atrial myocardium through the sinoatrial (SA) zone (sinoatrial conduction). Disturbances in any of these components lead to sinus node dysfunction (SND). They are based on numerous reasons, some of which, internal, lead to structural damage to the tissue of the node and perinodal zone (often extending to the atrial myocardium) or are reduced to a primary dysfunction of ion channels. Other, external causes are due to the action of drugs, autonomous influences or the influence of other external factors that lead to disruption of the function of the SG in the absence of its organic damage. The relative conventionality of such a division is determined by the fact that external factors are always present in the presence of internal causes, enhancing the manifestations of sinus node dysfunction.
    The most important internal cause of DSU is the replacement of sinus node tissue with fibrous and fatty tissue, and the degenerative process usually extends to the perinodal zone, atrial myocardium and atrioventricular node. This determines the accompanying disorders that are inextricably linked with the DSU. Degenerative changes in the SU can be caused by myocardial ischemia, including myocardial infarction, infiltrative (sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, tumors) and infectious processes (diphtheria, Chagas disease, Lyme disease), collagenoses (rheumatism, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma) and other forms of inflammation (myocarditis, pericarditis). In addition, there is reason to believe that damage to the artery of the sinus node of various nature can also lead to dysfunction of the sinus node. But in most cases, there is idiopathic degenerative fibrosis, which is inextricably linked with aging. In young people, a common cause of SU damage is trauma after surgery for congenital heart defects. Familial forms of sinus node dysfunction have also been described, in which there are no organic heart lesions, and the sinus pathology, designated as isolated, is associated with mutations in the genes responsible for sodium channels and pacemaker current channels (If) in the sinus cells.
    External causes primarily include the influence of drugs (beta-blockers, calcium current blockers, cardiac glycosides, antiarrhythmic drugs of class I, III and V, antihypertensive drugs, etc.). A special place is occupied by syndromes mediated by autonomic influences, such as neurocardiac syncope, hypersensitivity of the carotid sinus, reflex influences caused by coughing, urination, defecation and vomiting. DSU is caused by electrolyte imbalance (hypo- and hyperkalemia), hypothyroidism, rarely hyperthyroidism, hypothermia, increased intracranial pressure, hypoxia (sleep apnea). In idiopathic forms of DSU, a possible mechanism is increased vagal tone or deficiency of atrial cholinesterase, as well as the production of antibodies to M2 cholinergic receptors, which have stimulating activity.
    The prevalence of DSU cannot be adequately assessed due to the inability to count asymptomatic cases and the difficulty of differentiating between physiological and pathological bradycardia in population studies. The frequency of detection of DSU increases with age, but in the group over 50 years of age it is only 5/3000 (0.17%). The frequency of symptomatic cases of DSU is estimated by the number of implantations of artificial pacemakers (API), but these numbers vary greatly in different countries, which is associated not only with demographic characteristics and the prevalence of the disease, but also with material security and characteristics of the indications for implantation. However, DSU accounts for about half of all pacemaker implantations, and their frequency distribution by age is bimodal with peaks in the intervals of 20-30 and 60-70 years.
    Rice. 1. Electrocardiographic manifestations of sinus node dysfunction associated with impaired automatic function. A – sinus bradycardia. B – sinus node stops. B – long sinus pause. D – post-tachycardia arrest of the sinus node with an escape rhythm from the AV junction. D - post-tachycardia arrest of the sinus node with slipping impulses from the AV junction and relapse of atrial fibrillation.Disorders of the SG function have a variety of electrocardiographic manifestations. The most common form is sinus bradycardia (SB). A rare atrial rhythm is characterized by excitation of the atria from the SU region (see the chapter “Special examination of patients with cardiac arrhythmias”), and in the presence of arrhythmia, the R-R intervals change smoothly from cycle to cycle (Fig. 1A). The basis of SB is a decrease in the automatic control function of the control system.
    More pronounced violations of the automatism of the sinus system lead to the arrest of the sinus system, manifested by a sinus pause of varying duration. A characteristic feature of this pause is that it is never a multiple of the duration of the previous sinus cycle, even taking into account the tolerance for arrhythmia. There are obvious difficulties in qualifying such pauses as SS stops. There are no generally accepted quantitative criteria in this regard, and the solution to the issue largely depends on the severity of sinus arrhythmia and the average frequency of the preceding rhythm. Regardless of the frequency and severity of the arrhythmia, a pause lasting more than twice the duration of the previous sinus cycle definitely indicates arrest of the sinus cycle (Fig. 1B). If the pause is shorter than this value, then to state that the control system has stopped, it is required, based on the maximum normal frequency of 40 pulses/min, that it be more than 2 s, which is equivalent to exceeding the previous cycle by 25% or more. Such pauses, however, may not have clinical significance, and then the criterion for stopping the SU is proposed to be a pause duration of more than 3 s, which excludes its physiological nature.
    A different kind of difficulty arises when diagnosing AC arrests during very long pauses, when there is no complete confidence that the basis is only the mechanism of suppression of the automaticity of the AC in the absence of simultaneous blockade of SA conduction (Fig. 1B). The use of the multiplicity criterion is difficult to apply here, firstly, due to the ambiguity of the choice of the reference cycle (Fig. 1B), secondly, due to its absence in cases of development of a post-tachycardia pause and, thirdly, due to the interference of escape impulses and rhythms (Fig. 1D, E). Although it is believed that the basis of post-tachycardia pauses is the suppression of SA automaticity by frequent atrial impulses (overdrive suppression), the participation of SA conduction disorders cannot be ruled out. Therefore, when denoting prolonged asystoles, they prefer to avoid terms indicating the mechanism of the phenomenon, often using the term sinus pause.
    Another cause of sinus pauses is disruption of SA conduction. Prolongation of SA conduction time (1st degree SA block) has no electrocardiographic manifestations and can only be detected by direct recording of the SA potential or indirect methods using atrial electrical stimulation. With SA blockade of the second degree, Mobitz type I (with Wenckebach periodicity), there is a progressive increase in the time of successive sinus impulses in the SA zone until a complete blockade of the next impulse develops. On the ECG, this is manifested by cyclic changes in the P-P intervals with their progressive shortening, followed by a pause, the duration of which is always less than twice the P-P interval (Fig. 2A). With second-degree SA block Mobitz type II, blocking of sinus impulses occurs without a previous prolongation of SA conduction time, and on the ECG this is manifested by pauses, the duration of which is almost exactly (taking into account the tolerance for arrhythmia) a multiple of the duration of the previous P-P interval (Fig. 2B). With further inhibition of SA conductivity, the frequency of impulse conduction in periodic periods decreases until the development of SA blockade of the second degree 2:1 (Fig. 2B). When it is stable, the ECG picture is indistinguishable from sinus bradycardia (Fig. 2D). In addition, blocked atrial extrasystole in the form of bigeminy, having no relation to DSU, imitates both sinus bradycardia and SA block of the second degree 2:1 (Fig. 2D). Distortions of the T wave, indicating the possible presence of premature atrial excitation, cannot always be correctly interpreted, since a notch in the T wave may be a natural manifestation of repolarization disorders against the background of a rare rhythm. The problem of differential diagnosis is solved by long-term ECG recording with capture of transient processes. In the case of blocked atrial extrasystole, esophageal electrocardiography may be required.


    Rice. 39. Electrocardiographic manifestations of sinus node dysfunction associated with impaired sinoatrial conduction. A – SA block of the second degree, type I, with a periodicity of 9:8. B – SA block of the second degree, type II. B – SA block of the second degree, type I with periods of 2:1 and 3:2. D - SA blockade of the second degree, type I with stable development of periodicity 2:1. D – development of an episode of blocked atrial extrasystole in the form of bigeminy, simulating manifestations of sinus node dysfunction.
    The development of advanced second-degree SA block is manifested by prolonged sinus pauses, the duration of which is a multiple of the previous atrial cycle. But the same problems of diagnosing the long pause mechanism that are described for stopping the control system remain. One of the provoking factors in the development of advanced second-degree SA block is a critical increase in sinus impulses associated with physical or other stress. In this case, a sharp decrease in heart rate from the frequency determined by metabolic needs, as a rule, manifests itself in clinical symptoms.


    Rice. 3. Sinoatrial block of the third degree with escape rhythms from the atria. Note: the asterisks in fragment B indicate sinus impulses.
    The extreme degree of disruption of SA conduction, SA block of the third degree, is manifested by the absence of sinus impulses during the electrical activity of the atria in the form of escape atrial rhythms (Fig. 3) or a rhythm from the AV junction. In this case, individual impulses from the SG can rarely be observed (Fig. 3B). This condition, difficult to differentiate from cardiac arrest, should not be identified with the complete absence of electrical activity of the atria, referred to as atrial standstill. This condition is associated with electrical non-excitability of the atrial myocardium with possibly preserved sinus mechanism (hyperkalemia).
    SU dysfunction is often accompanied by a number of additional manifestations. First of all, these are escape impulses and rhythms emanating from the atria or AV junction. They occur during sufficiently long sinus pauses, and the development of clinical symptoms of DSU largely depends on the activity of their sources. Like the SU, second-order pacemakers are subject to the influence of autonomic and humoral influences, as well as the phenomenon of overdrive suppression. Since DSU from internal causes is characterized by the spread of the degenerative process to the atrial myocardium, this creates the basis for the development of atrial arrhythmias, primarily atrial fibrillation. At the moment of cessation of arrhythmia, favorable conditions are created for the development of prolonged asystole, since the automatism of the AC and second-order pacemakers are in a depressed state. This usually leads to clinical symptoms, and a similar condition in the form of tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome was first described by D. Short in 1954. Due to widespread atrial damage and the important role of parasympathetic influences in DSU, atrioventricular conduction disorders are a common concomitant condition .
    SG dysfunction and inextricably linked clinical manifestations and accompanying arrhythmias form a clinical and electrocardiographic symptom complex. For the first time, B. Laun, observing various manifestations of DSU after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with a characteristic low ventricular rate, used the term sick sinus syndrome, translated into Russian and rooted as sick sinus syndrome (SSNS). Subsequently, this term was used to combine both the manifestations of DSU and accompanying arrhythmias, including tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, and concomitant disorders of atrioventricular conduction. Chronotropic inconsistency was later added. The ongoing evolution of terminology has led to the fact that currently the preferred term for this syndrome is sinus node dysfunction, and the term SSSU is proposed to be used in cases of DSU with clinical symptoms. This syndrome includes:
    • persistent, often pronounced, sinus bradycardia;
    • sinus node arrests and sinoatrial blocks;
    • persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter with a low ventricular rate in the absence of drug reduction therapy;
    • chronotropic inconsistency.
    The natural course of DSU (SSSS) is characterized by its unpredictability: long periods of normal sinus rhythm and long-term remission of clinical symptoms are possible. However, DSU (SSSU), primarily from internal causes, tends to progress in the majority of patients, and SB in combination with stopping the SU and SA blockades, on average, after 13 (7-29) years reaches the degree of complete stop of SA activity. At the same time, mortality directly related to DSU (SSSU) does not exceed 2% over a 6-7 year observation period. Age, concomitant diseases, especially coronary artery disease, and the presence of heart failure are important factors determining the prognosis: annual mortality during the first 5 years of observation in patients with DSU and concomitant diseases is 4-5% higher than that in patients without DSU of the same age and with the same heart disease. vascular pathology. The mortality rate of patients with DSU without concomitant pathology does not differ from the control group. Over time, atrioventricular conduction disturbances are identified and progress, but they are not pronounced and do not affect the prognosis. Of greater importance is the increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation, estimated at 5-17% per year. It is primarily associated with the high incidence of thromboembolic complications in DSU (SSSU), which account for 30 to 50% of all deaths. It has been shown that the prognosis of patients with takycardia-bradycardia syndrome is significantly worse compared to other forms of DSU. This provides an important indication of the direction of treatment for such patients and the need for careful identification of asymptomatic atrial arrhythmias.
    In the diagnosis of DSU, the most important task is to confirm the connection between clinical symptoms and bradycardia, i.e. identification of clinical-electrocardiographic correlation. That is why the most important elements of examining the patient are a thorough analysis of the patient’s complaints, described in detail in the section “Differential diagnosis of fainting,” and an electrocardiographic examination. Since a standard ECG in rare cases can be recorded at the time of development of symptoms that are transient in nature, long-term ECG monitoring methods play a major role. These include ECG Holter monitoring, the use of event recorders with loop memory, remote (home) ECG monitoring, and implantation of ECG recorders. For indications for their use, see the section “Special examination of patients with cardiac arrhythmias.” The results obtained using these methods directly guide treatment directions. The use of Holter monitoring alone for up to 7 days makes it possible to establish a clinical-electrocardiographic correlation in no less than 48% of cases. However, in some cases, this diagnostic strategy gives too delayed a result, which may be unacceptable due to the severity of clinical symptoms. In these cases, provocative tests are used, which, unfortunately, are characterized by a fairly high frequency of false-positive and false-negative results.
    As such methods (see section “Special examination of patients with cardiac arrhythmias”), exercise testing provides invaluable assistance in diagnosing chronotropic incompetence and in identifying DSU associated in natural conditions with physical activity. Carotid sinus massage and passive orthostatic test play an important role as provoking neuro-reflex tests. To assess the role of external and internal causes of DSU (SSSU), pharmacological tests are important. Atrial electrical stimulation for the diagnosis of DSU is limited in its use, which is associated with the low frequency of detection of positive clinical-electrocardiographic correlation, and the indication for invasive EPS is the need to exclude other arrhythmic causes of syncope.
    Treatment of patients with DSU involves the following areas: elimination of bradycardia with its clinical manifestations, elimination of concomitant cardiac arrhythmias and prevention of thromboembolic complications and, of course, treatment of the underlying disease. Asymptomatic patients with DSU in the absence of organic heart disease and concomitant arrhythmias do not require treatment. At the same time, such patients should avoid medications that may be prescribed for reasons not related to cardiovascular pathology and that inhibit the function of the thyroid gland (lithium drugs and other psychotropic drugs, cimetidine, adenosine, etc.). In the presence of organic cardiovascular diseases, the situation is complicated by the need to prescribe such drugs (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, cardiac glycosides). Particular problems may arise in connection with the prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs for the treatment of concomitant arrhythmias, primarily atrial fibrillation. If it is not possible to achieve the desired result by selecting medications that have a lesser effect on the function of the SU, or by reducing the dose of drugs, then the worsening of the DSU with the appearance of its clinical symptoms will require implantation of an IVR. In patients with existing clinical symptoms of DSU, the issue of IVR implantation requires priority consideration.
    Continuous electrical stimulation of the heart eliminates the clinical manifestations of DSU, but does not affect overall mortality. It turns out that single-chamber atrial pacing (AAIR) or dual-chamber pacing (DDDR) have advantages over single-chamber ventricular pacing (VVIR): exercise tolerance increases, the incidence of pacemaker syndrome decreases, and, most importantly, the incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events decreases. complications. Moreover, the advantages of dual-chamber stimulation over single-chamber atrial stimulation have been identified, which are determined by the lower frequency of development of paroxysms of atrial fibrillation and the lower frequency of reimplantation of stimulators, which are required with atrial stimulation due to the development of atrioventricular conduction disorders. It has also been shown that long-term stimulation of the right ventricle due to excitation dyssynchrony causes disruption of the contractile function of the left ventricle, and to reduce the number of imposed ventricular excitations during dual-chamber stimulation, algorithms are used that give advantage to the own impulses conducted to the ventricles. Thus, dual-chamber pacing with rate adaptation and AV delay control (DDDR + AVM) is currently recognized as the first choice pacing method. Indications for this treatment method are presented in table. 1.It should, however, be taken into account that in the event of the development of DSU due to transient, clearly reversible causes, the issue of pacemaker implantation should be postponed, and treatment should be aimed at correcting the causing conditions (medicine overdose, electrolyte disturbances, consequences of infectious diseases, thyroid dysfunction, etc.) .d.). Atropine, theophylline, and temporary electrical stimulation of the heart can be used as a means of eliminating DSU. Persistent atrial fibrillation with a low ventricular rate should be considered as a natural self-healing of DSU and should be refrained from restoring sinus rhythm.
    Antithrombotic therapy should be carried out in all cases of concomitant atrial tachyarrhythmias in full accordance with the recommendations for antithrombotic therapy of atrial fibrillation (see the corresponding section of the Guidelines).Taking into account modern treatment, the prognosis of DSU is determined by the underlying disease, age, the presence of heart failure and thromboembolic complications, the frequency of which can be influenced by adequate antithrombotic therapy and an adequate choice of pacing regimen.
    Table 1. Indications for continuous cardiac stimulation in case of sinus node dysfunction